TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Sen Feinstein: Why I changed my mind about Cali’s Diablo Canyon nuclear plant

23 点作者 kdsudac将近 3 年前

5 条评论

jmyeet将近 3 年前
Senator Feinstein ran for reelection at aged 85. A full term in the Senate is 6 years. So if she didn&#x27;t die in that time (which is a very real possibility at her age) then she would be 91 at the end of her term. That&#x27;s... ridiculous.<p>She seems to be in clear mental decline now, so much so that she stepped down (some say was removed) from the senate Judiciary committee [1].<p>So what allowed her to get renominated? Simple she was good at the most important thing for a large blue state Democratic Senator: fundraising. For whatever reason, she was a <i>massive</i> rainmaker. You have to be to be nominated as a Demorat for Senate in California. kamala Harris was too. It&#x27;s pretty much how she rose to being VP now.<p>It&#x27;s also why Chuck Schumer is the Senate Majority Leader and also why you will <i>never</i> see any serious Wall Street reform under the current system. It is the core of Schumer&#x27;s fundraising base.<p>So there&#x27;s a fine line between fundraising and corruption (legally speaking). Unfortuantely this Supreme Court has decided that money is speech [2], which has made all this even more important.<p>As polarized as things may seem, all that is on social issues. Both parties have class solidarity with the capital-owning class that has bought both sides.<p>So we can look at Feinstein&#x27;s &quot;corruption&quot; in isolation but that&#x27;s really missing the forest for the trees.<p>[1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.politico.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;2020&#x2F;11&#x2F;23&#x2F;dianne-feinstein-step-down-senate-judiciary-439836" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.politico.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;2020&#x2F;11&#x2F;23&#x2F;dianne-feinstein-st...</a><p>[2]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Citizens_United_v._FEC#:~:text=Because%20spending%20money%20is%20essential,to%20speak%20on%20political%20issues" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Citizens_United_v._FEC#:~:text...</a>.
评论 #31758392 未加载
评论 #31756951 未加载
评论 #31757207 未加载
评论 #31764279 未加载
评论 #31756807 未加载
评论 #31759905 未加载
评论 #31760504 未加载
martin1975将近 3 年前
Closing down instead of building modern nuclear plants will prove to be the worst knee jerk&#x2F;emotional decisions California&#x27;s leaders have ever made. I hope she&#x27;s serious about not only keeping Diablo Canyon open but restarting San Onofre as well as building new nuclear power plants. Nuclear is the best option, despite any perceived risks.
评论 #31756739 未加载
scotuswroteus将近 3 年前
Senator Feinstein is perceived as low key corrupt and an entitled oligarch. Look at how she talks to kids: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=eIebWywFfNw&amp;ab_channel=USATODAY" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=eIebWywFfNw&amp;ab_channel=USATO...</a> She&#x27;s just not the person who has credibility to tell Californians not to fear nuclear power.
评论 #31756145 未加载
评论 #31756304 未加载
评论 #31756494 未加载
评论 #31757188 未加载
mox1将近 3 年前
This is the same senator who is widely reported to be &#x27;not all there&#x27; mentally. Not sure if her endorsement means much at the moment....
评论 #31755818 未加载
yellowapple将近 3 年前
And what&#x27;s stopping her from changing her mind again? It&#x27;s great that she&#x27;s finally against further kneecapping California&#x27;s non-carbon-emitting energy, but how long until the fossil fuel lobbyists pay her to parrot their anti-nuclear bullshit again?