> “I applaud the transparency here,” says Emily M. Bender, a computational linguist at the University of Washington<p>Then on <a href="https://ai.facebook.com/blog/democratizing-access-to-large-scale-language-models-with-opt-175b/" rel="nofollow">https://ai.facebook.com/blog/democratizing-access-to-large-s...</a> :<p>> request access to OPT-175B here<p>> Pretrained models are all licensed under the OPT-175B License Agreement.<p>If you want "transparency" and kudos for releasing something "openly", why not just release it actually openly and without some complex license agreement?