TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Microsoft beat Apple to buy PowerPoint for $14M (2016)

276 点作者 jasim将近 3 年前

19 条评论

dingosity将近 3 年前
I love these first hand accounts from the 80s.<p>My very small related story is in &#x27;89 I was in Dallas and got a contracting gig from Aldus to work on Persuasion (Aldus&#x27; competitor to PowerPoint) for the Mac. I showed up for my first day, but the guy I was supposed to work for wasn&#x27;t there yet so the office manager got me a desk and a notepad and IT came and made sure the Mac on my desk was properly connected to the network. After an hour or two of twiddling my thumbs and trying to look like I was doing something productive, my boss came in to say &quot;oh. looks like a lot of us were laid off today and we&#x27;re canceling your contract.&quot;<p>The Aldus guys were reasonable about it and gave me 2 weeks severance just for holding down the chair for two hours.<p>It has to be the shortest professional gig I&#x27;ve ever had.
评论 #31921281 未加载
评论 #31922481 未加载
评论 #31939597 未加载
coldcode将近 3 年前
Persuasion was better than Powerpoint in every way; but even when Adobe bought it from Aldus, it could not compete with &quot;free&quot; i.e. PP being part of Office, and did not last long in the 90&#x27;s. Office also basically killed word processing innovation and spreadsheet innovation for a long time.<p>Today almost no one remembers any of these types of apps that existed before Office. I remember since I was involved in several of them.
评论 #31922525 未加载
评论 #31924009 未加载
评论 #31923364 未加载
评论 #31921084 未加载
评论 #31920650 未加载
评论 #31923274 未加载
评论 #31932830 未加载
评论 #31927083 未加载
评论 #31919785 未加载
pauliephonic将近 3 年前
If Apple had succeeded in buying Powerpoint, whatever alternative Microsoft purchased (or made) would have become the de facto standard anyway.
评论 #31920288 未加载
评论 #31919183 未加载
评论 #31920665 未加载
评论 #31920480 未加载
评论 #31919612 未加载
s1mon将近 3 年前
If you really want to read more than you ever wanted to know about the history of powerpoint, Robert Gaskins - one of the creators - wrote a whole book of the history [0] and has a detailed web site with tons more details [1].<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.robertgaskins.com&#x2F;powerpoint-history&#x2F;sweating-bullets&#x2F;gaskins-sweating-bullets-webpdf-isbn-9780985142414.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.robertgaskins.com&#x2F;powerpoint-history&#x2F;sweating-bu...</a><p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.robertgaskins.com" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.robertgaskins.com</a>
评论 #31920722 未加载
评论 #31920681 未加载
评论 #31920369 未加载
linguae将近 3 年前
A world where Apple had acquired PowerPoint in 1987 could have hurt Apple&#x27;s own HyperCard, which was also released in 1987. HyperCard did have its moment of success from its release in 1987 to roughly the mid-1990s.<p>Back on our timeline where Microsoft acquired PowerPoint, HyperCard could have been a strong competitor to PowerPoint well into the 2000s had (1) Apple gave HyperCard&#x27;s development more love, (2) Apple authorized a port to Windows during the Windows 3.1 era, and (3) Apple developed functionality to convert HyperCard stacks to Web applications and released this around 1995 or 1996.
评论 #31920418 未加载
fnordpiglet将近 3 年前
… and destroyed the global productivity gains brought by automation for generations.
评论 #31919414 未加载
gwbas1c将近 3 年前
&gt; Key personnel, to be named (but certainly including all the senior developers and me), would be required to agree to relocate to Redmond as a condition of the deal.<p>That&#x27;s <i>horrible.</i> I&#x27;ve moved quite a few times for my spouse, and the last one was extremely painful. (I made her promise that it was the last time she asks to move for career reasons.)<p>Many of us are in two-career relationships. We have children and families. Casually expecting that we can move on the drop of a hat is short-sighted, and a good way to make an acquisition fail.
评论 #31920897 未加载
iakh将近 3 年前
What was the reasoning for pursuing a 14m offer from Microsoft over multiple others at 18m?
评论 #31921819 未加载
评论 #31920060 未加载
评论 #31919932 未加载
评论 #31920280 未加载
评论 #31920085 未加载
asddubs将近 3 年前
The article year is kind of confusing on this one, it made me go &quot;that can&#x27;t be right, Microsoft owned PowerPoint before then... didn&#x27;t it?&quot;
评论 #31920120 未加载
评论 #31922071 未加载
hbn将近 3 年前
&gt; There is a lot of convoluted bit shifting that occurs in order to get the address and data from a Game Genie. This is probably to make the Game Genie codes seem more magical. After all, given 2 Game Genie codes, one that granted 5 lives on startup and another code that granted 9 lives, and the only difference between the 2 codes was one character, even a novice player could probably figure out that modifying that one character to any of the acceptable letter characters would grant between 1 and 16 lives on startup.<p>Why would they want to intentionally obfuscate it though? Doesn&#x27;t it just add more value to their product if people are able to reverse-engineer codes and come up with better stuff?<p>Or maybe the real reason to randomize things more is because it creates more potential for diversity in the effects of codes? e.g. instead of a code that gives you 5 lives and a one-character-different code that gives you 9 lives, by randomizing things the first code gives you 5 lives and the second code makes you fly<p>Assuming I&#x27;m understanding things correctly
评论 #31926852 未加载
re将近 3 年前
I was curious what PowerPoint looked like in 1987 and found this video of someone exploring a sample presentation that came with it: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;vimeo.com&#x2F;181999729" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;vimeo.com&#x2F;181999729</a>
评论 #31925548 未加载
ppg677将近 3 年前
Amazing the comments here. I&#x27;ve used nothing but Google Sheets for 14 years now.
wellthisisgreat将近 3 年前
Keynote was one of the eye-opening moments for me when switching from Win to Mac, and one of the big reasons I am committed to staying in Apple’s ecosystem.
thanatropism将近 3 年前
This sounds like a stereotype, but I use Beamer whenever I can.<p>Otherwise: I don&#x27;t use Emacs (I actually do Beamer in Overleaf, the easy-o online latex editor), can write regexes but don&#x27;t have a clue of what awk does, use Notion and the Google calendar thing instead of text tools and write my todo.txt in pen in my wrist (or did when I worked in an office and could conceal it with business button-down shirts).<p>But Beamer, oh la la.
gigatexal将近 3 年前
Good. Had they bought PowerPoint and then became successful they’d get big, rich, and lazy. And we’d never have gotten the iMac or later the iPhone.
评论 #31919450 未加载
评论 #31920007 未加载
评论 #31922419 未加载
评论 #31919650 未加载
PinguTS将近 3 年前
The article is interesting in the part of buying PowerPoint.<p>But what happened with the other &quot;big&quot; product mentioned briefly in the article: &quot;FileMaker Plus&quot;? Does that mean that some people stayed with the &quot;old&quot; company and then got later acquired by Apple? Because AFAIK, FileMaker these days is a subsidiary of Apple.
评论 #31919951 未加载
Maursault将近 3 年前
FTA: &gt; It was the first significant acquisition made by Microsoft.<p>Nope! That honor goes to 86-DOS 1.10, acquired by Microsoft for $75K in July 1981.
indigodaddy将近 3 年前
I would imagine they now wished they had taken the MSFT stock…
评论 #31920166 未加载
pluc将近 3 年前
Can we update the title to reflect that this is a 2016 story about a 1987 event
评论 #31919041 未加载