Would you invest or use AI produced content, that promises SEO benefits and visibility?<p>Have you used it, does it work for you? Is the spend of subscription benefial and gives the lift and viewership?<p>We hear a lot from successful content writers, influencers, industry experts and leadership that authentic and genuine content is better as it connects with your TAM. you thoughts?<p>What softwares might you suggest if you have used and see value.
This might be interesting, someone tried to use GPT-3 to generate 1.8k articles by scraping a competitor's sitemap: <a href="https://twitter.com/MackGrenfell/status/1514557363902205952" rel="nofollow">https://twitter.com/MackGrenfell/status/1514557363902205952</a>
> Would you invest or use AI produced content, that promises SEO benefits and visibility?<p>I would, but SEO isn't an important motivation.<p>> Have you used it<p>I have not<p>> We hear a lot from successful content writers, influencers, industry experts and leadership that authentic and genuine content is better as it connects with your TAM<p>The point being "content". I don't think we're quite there yet where AI can write product test reports (it can generate natural looking text from data tables), comment on politics (other than summarizing publications) or synthesize engaging music (they're pretty good at synthpop and jazz as long as you don't listen too closely).<p>> What softwares might you suggest if you have used and see value<p>Something that expands keywords and screen shots into bug descriptions and user manuals. EDIT you meant "examples of software like the one you are talking about"? Sorry, no idea.
Yes, but only for concise pieces. No bullshit.<p>The thing is Google created a problem with the "longer content" is better, longer content is not better if most of the text is there to stuff keywords and please the algorithms.<p>1- I think automated content is good.<p>2- People using it shouldn't abuse it, if you make content longer than it has to be you are wasting other people's life.<p>3- A lot of people are gonna abuse it.
Well I see the potential for abuse. There are already blogs using some tool to automatically churn out content, it’s just the tools are private and consumers think it was hand crafted by talented writers, when it uses AI.<p>Personally I prefer human written content since it’s less spammy and often has nuances in it that machines can’t simulate, no matter how well they are programmed.