TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

How I automated my writing career

142 点作者 RobbieStats超过 13 年前

16 条评论

jonnathanson超过 13 年前
Just a prediction here, so take it for what it's worth, but my hunch is that the profession of writing is going to fragment into more and more subsets in the coming years. At the low end of the totem pole -- what we'll call "low-value" writing -- will be the sorts of articles that software can eventually automate. Things like news updates, information dumps, how-to pieces, lists, summaries, and so forth. Much of what traditional journalism would call "news" stories, and what magazine journalism would call "informational" pieces, fall into this bucket. In these sorts of articles, substance is more important than style. These pieces are all about the facts, or summations of the facts. Or, in the case of content farms, they're about relaying and recombining information in endless mixes, using provocative headlines. You don't need a Pulitzer-caliber author to crank these out. Hell, pretty soon you won't even need a <i>human</i> to crank them out. It's no surprise that this type of writing doesn't pay well, because frankly, it's the fast food of journalism. It's cheap, it's disposable to the consumer, and so it pays cheaply.<p>On the other hand, higher-value writing will be that which isn't easily automated, and for which style is every bit as important as substance. Fiction (good fiction, at least), features, human-interest stories, editorials (especially those relying on expertise), and so forth. This will be the kind of writing that either pays crap, or pays big, depending on the writer's skill level -- and his or her ability to build a market or following for it. There will always be a need for this kind of writing, and until such time as software AI becomes genuinely creative, it'll be very hard to automate the highest-quality, most interesting, and most innovative stuff.<p>Low-value writing will, if anything, see its value decline even further. It is the equivalent of the man on the assembly line who can be replaced by a tireless, hyper-efficient machine. High-value writing will not, on average, find itself paying more handsomely than it used to. It will still be a high-variance profession. But it will be what remains for professional writers in the age of content farms, automated news, social networking, and so forth.<p>Essentially, the way to earn a decent living in the future will be: 1) be damned good, 2) build and maintain a following, 3) differentiate yourself, and 4) produce at high volume.
评论 #3193094 未加载
评论 #3192934 未加载
评论 #3195168 未加载
gvb超过 13 年前
That was a very inaccurate headline on the story.<p><i>Our software can create eight paragraphs now, but is it possible to create eight chapters' worth of content? The answer is "yes," but not quite the same kind of technical books I used to write, at least right now.</i><p>...which is why the previous paragraph says "[b]ecause I've been so focused on running Automated Insights, I haven't had time to write any new books recently."<p>That is a variant on the Calvin and Hobbes bed making robot[1]. I strongly suspect he will end up like Calvin, with something that doesn't work as planned. If he is lucky, like Calvin he will find he accomplished his goal, but discover he started with the wrong goal in mind.<p>[1] <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=NV4WEqQtvTYC&#38;pg=PA126&#38;lpg=PA126&#38;dq=calvin+and+hobbes+bed+robot&#38;source=bl&#38;ots=xev_NyjpE1&#38;sig=4cu_iiiCbl4jYAAJ1fL28akEUEQ&#38;hl=en&#38;ei=rcayTpPWBa-OsALw06z6Aw&#38;sa=X&#38;oi=book_result&#38;ct=result&#38;resnum=5&#38;ved=0CDkQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&#38;q&#38;f=false" rel="nofollow">http://books.google.com/books?id=NV4WEqQtvTYC&#38;pg=PA126&#...</a>
评论 #3193148 未加载
swombat超过 13 年前
"How I didn't do what I claimed in the title, really, but I'm going to use this title anyway because it's bound to get clicks and upvotes"<p><i>cynic</i>
jgrahamc超过 13 年前
Slightly off topic, but when I was writing The Geek Atlas one of the things I did was keep metrics about my writing so that I knew where I was, and then I used those metrics to predict the book's delivery date to O'Reilly, and measure how I was doing against the required delivery date.<p>This was all done in a spreadsheet and it enabled me to see whether I was ahead or behind on my writing. Turned out to be very, very useful.
评论 #3192368 未加载
sharmajai超过 13 年前
On an unrelated note, if you highlight a portion of the article, you can listen to it. Very useful for listening to articles while working, instead of listening to music, or just to rest your eyes.<p>It is powered by <a href="http://www.readspeaker.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.readspeaker.com</a> and AFAICT is the best sounding Text to Speech implementation, I have heard so far.<p>If you just listen to the text, it sounds like a human news reader, much better than Siri. Wow. And the cherry on the top is that it highlights the text which it is reading as it's being read.
jawns超过 13 年前
I tried a little automated journalism a while back and wrote a blog post about my code:<p>"I wrote this article with one mouse click" <a href="http://coding.pressbin.com/60/I-wrote-this-article-with-one-mouse-click" rel="nofollow">http://coding.pressbin.com/60/I-wrote-this-article-with-one-...</a><p>There are a whole bunch of little things that go into play with something like this that you just don't think much about until you try it -- stuff like subject/verb agreement, when to use figures and when to spell out numbers, etc.
brador超过 13 年前
What's Googles take on this? Are they for or against automated content creation? Will they be kicking these sites out of search or letting them stay?
评论 #3192554 未加载
pdenya超过 13 年前
I loved the 3rd bullet point: "Software doesn't get bored and start wondering how to automate itself."<p>I'm not sure if this will ever be applied to non-data driven fields but this is still extremely cool.
hkmurakami超过 13 年前
"A common, and funny, question I get from journalists is:* "when will you automate me out out of a job?"* I find the question humorous because built into the question is the assumption that if our software can write the perfect story on a particular topic, then no one else should attempt to write about it. <i>That's just not going to happen."</i><p>It only takes one misguided and uninformed manager to fire good writers, thinking that they can be replaced with an army of computers, only to find that the product is now crap. Damage will have been done.<p>The example I'm thinking of? Square-Enix firing their developers and outsourcing core development to China. The Result? Crappy games. (In a humorous twist, they've since then been asking the very developers they fired to come back and work for them)
3dFlatLander超过 13 年前
It makes sense that the sports genre was chosen. With scores, winners, teams, tournaments and the like all being mentioned in pretty much every article out there, it stands to reason that it would be fairly easy to parse them all and get good data. I'd imagine tech and celebrity writing would also work well.<p>Political stories have such a wide range of views, this approach would produce gibberish until you sort out all the articles on a left-right scale.
评论 #3193192 未加载
snorkel超过 13 年前
If you're writing style happens to be very repetitive and templatized, then yes, you've automated your writing career.<p>A more likely scenario for applying this tech to journalism would be for providing filler paragraphs around the more substantive prose banged out by an human journalist, that way the journalist doesn't have to write as much or spend time on pulling tedious raw data into the story.
shabble超过 13 年前
A friend of mine was working on an automated story telling system for Nethack as his Masters (Linguistics &#38; CS/AI, IIRC) thesis.<p>It was never really completed, but there was some interesting work in applying goal-based planning AI in reverse to generate possible long-term motivations for individual actions.<p>I don't think it's available online though, sadly.
JeremyStein超过 13 年前
Funny how articles about computer-generated prose are never computer-generated.
hammock超过 13 年前
Would like to see an example of this - even if it's not all that impressive - applied to some non-data intensive area, i.e. someplace other than reporting (sports, finance, etc).
评论 #3192464 未加载
legec超过 13 年前
I stand unimpressed. I am still waiting for "How I automated my reading hacker news"...
评论 #3193194 未加载
danso超过 13 年前
This is one example he gives of his automated writing: "Second-seeded North Carolina was defeated in the Elite Eight with a 76-69 loss to fourth-seeded Kentucky in the Regional Finals in Newark."<p>That's perfectly serviceable. But it makes me wonder...what is the point of this? Not his automated-writing tool, but why are we putting what was meant for a statistical/symbolic graphic into sentence form?<p>This kind of writing is only possible with the collection of discrete datapoints: the date, the score, the participants, and the location. From there, you can do any kind of variation of subject-verb etc., even adding adjectives if the point spread is high.<p>So we're taking data and turning it into a less efficiently readable form. It's no fault of the auto-writer of course, that's just how we are taught to read and write. Someday, we move towards a society in which other forms of communication, particularly visual, are as commonplace. [insert your own Tufte-inspired rant here)
评论 #3193496 未加载