TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Documents reveal McKinsey's role increasing opioid sales until 2019

354 点作者 Jerry2将近 3 年前

12 条评论

wefarrell将近 3 年前
I was hanging out with my pharmacist friend and he mentioned that a decade his friend invited him to go into business opening up a pain clinic but it was pretty obvious it was a pill mill and he told his friend no thanks. His friend went on to make multiple millions of dollars very quickly and will never face consequences.<p>It got me thinking that there were probably tens of thousands of people who each made millions of dollars knowing full well what they were doing was killing people and they will never face any consequences for their actions.
评论 #31964749 未加载
评论 #31964542 未加载
评论 #31969303 未加载
评论 #31966708 未加载
评论 #31964778 未加载
评论 #31965437 未加载
8bitsrule将近 3 年前
Clearly what the US needs is a strong, broad Anti-Predation Act. With teeth in the form of regular detailed reporting, close scrutiny, and immense personal and financial penalties starting at the top. Since trafficking people is worth a 20-year sentence, then each death must certainly match that. $100,000 a day, up to 100 days, after which the business and all of its assets are forfeit ... as well as all of the assets of the principals. That oughta work.
can16358p将近 3 年前
Is there literally anything good that these consultancy&#x2F;auditing enterprises do?
评论 #31968188 未加载
dkobia将近 3 年前
Generally speaking if you are an authoritarian government or rogue company and can afford a company like McKinsey, they will take your money to consult and provide legitimacy. Scruples are overrated in this industry.
评论 #31966661 未加载
humaniania将近 3 年前
Sacklers got to keep their billions right?
评论 #31966624 未加载
评论 #31968273 未加载
UIUC_06将近 3 年前
&gt; In 2019, McKinsey cut ties with opioid manufacturers<p>So up until then, they were fine with it. In fact, abetting it. Now they&#x27;re apologizing.<p>If ever there were an argument for the corporate death penalty, this is it.
评论 #31964637 未加载
评论 #31964361 未加载
评论 #31964455 未加载
评论 #31964456 未加载
评论 #31967401 未加载
JCM9将近 3 年前
McKinsey used to be very respected but over the last 10 years or so has gone from scandal to scandal. McKinsey used to be the the place top graduates wanted to go, but today the best no longer seem interested in going there. What caused things to break down so badly? Did they just get too big and lost control of the culture?<p>Quite ironically they seem to need some serious advice on how to fix their own company.
评论 #31968060 未加载
tomohawk将近 3 年前
There&#x27;s this strange dichotomy in thinking around drugs.<p>On the one hand, you have people saying we should decriminalize drugs.<p>On the other hand, you have examples like this of what happens with drugs when they are distributed in a decriinalized way.
评论 #31967402 未加载
评论 #31967987 未加载
评论 #31968302 未加载
peyton将近 3 年前
I mean, if 2004– is the timeline, seems mostly opportunistic. The opioid stuff started in the mid 90s. “Pain is the fifth vital sign” and all that. You were made to feel like a shitty doctor if you didn’t get on board.
refurb将近 3 年前
&quot;I don&#x27;t have to sell nuthin&#x27;. This shit here? It sells itself.&quot;
infamouscow将近 3 年前
These scumbags are the reason I changed my mind on the death penalty.
notlukesky将近 3 年前
Unfortunately most consultancies like McKinsey play minimal roles, if any, from the companies that engage them. They are often used as excuses for things the company was already going to do. That way management says “look at McKinsey presentation” or “McKinsey says raise prices” and passes the buck to them in a very expensive way.
评论 #31964309 未加载
评论 #31967450 未加载
评论 #31964475 未加载