TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

NuoDB another NewSQL database.

58 点作者 steilpass超过 13 年前

10 条评论

LeafStorm超过 13 年前
To be completely honest, I have never heard the term "NewSQL" before in my life. After a quick Google, it seems that the term basically means "SQL databases that go FAST LIKE NOSQL." (Though it's not really popular.) Which is, once again, completely missing the point.<p>I can't speak for professional devs - I'm just a hobbyist - but I'm not developing for "NoSQL" databases like CouchDB and Redis because I want to do SUPER WEB SCALE. I'm developing for CouchDB and Redis because they offer truly interesting alternative ways to look at your data. (In fact, Redis is what got me interested in data structures.) And if I wanted to write a project that used data that makes sense from a relational standpoint, SQLite (for development) and Postgres (for production) are just fine with me.
评论 #3207680 未加载
评论 #3207172 未加载
评论 #3207665 未加载
wccrawford超过 13 年前
For those wondering about it, don't bother searching for 'NewSQL'. It's a buzzword that doesn't actually mean anything other than 'it's not mysql, pgsql, oracle, or mssql.' They claim to improve on the standard DBs, but every single DB does it in a different way. The name is useless.<p>Instead, read the 'who we are' and 'how it works' bits on NuoDB's page. They were much more informative.<p>I think it sounds exciting and fresh... And doesn't seem to be open source at all.<p>I'm not allergic to paying money for software, but I've found I'm happiest when using something that I can guarantee will survive, even if may have to do so by my own hand. Commercial products have a tendency to be a pain in the rear.
评论 #3206999 未加载
评论 #3207005 未加载
评论 #3208892 未加载
seiji超过 13 年前
Now with <i>Cloudbursting</i>!<p>Looks like they are doing a pure enterprise push: <i>NuoDB, Inc., the thought leader in cloud database technology, ...</i>
julochrobak超过 13 年前
I'm a big fan of relational theory and I'm always happy to see any activity in this space. However, their "revolutionary" distributed model seems to be similar to something which is already out there, open source, and ready for use:<p><a href="http://bandilab.org/blog/2011-06-22.Ostap.Running_on_Multiple_Nodes.html" rel="nofollow">http://bandilab.org/blog/2011-06-22.Ostap.Running_on_Multipl...</a><p>or maybe I just don't have enough information about the nuodb ?
评论 #3207560 未加载
moe超过 13 年前
Has anyone actually tried this wonder-machine or is it Vaporware?<p>I remember submitting an evaluation request almost a year ago but never received a response.<p>Their homepage and blog don't seem to have changed since then either; no real information anywhere, only truck-loads of PR fluff.
jbellis超过 13 年前
Their claims reminded me of Jim Starkey's history with the CAP theorem: <a href="http://pl.atyp.us/wordpress/index.php/2010/03/cap-and-leases/" rel="nofollow">http://pl.atyp.us/wordpress/index.php/2010/03/cap-and-leases...</a>
andrewcooke超过 13 年前
in case anyone else was wondering: the key CAP-related "compromise", from "how it works", is that on partition it supports transactions on only one sub-set of nodes (the "healthiest"); the others provide read-only snapshots.<p><a href="http://nuodb.com/how_it_works.html" rel="nofollow">http://nuodb.com/how_it_works.html</a> (see "Availability and Resiliency").
评论 #3208873 未加载
wmf超过 13 年前
Anybody know why they changed the name? Nimbus seems more pronounceable.
评论 #3207018 未加载
评论 #3207353 未加载
jcapote超过 13 年前
can't wait to read the white paper
评论 #3207223 未加载
MostAwesomeDude超过 13 年前
Alas, I can't downvote this link.<p>Can anybody explain why I should go with this instead of Pg?<p>To the submitter or anybody else sufficiently knowledgeable: When will ORMs get support for this? I use SQLA but could port Django or ActiveRecord code.
评论 #3207159 未加载
评论 #3207250 未加载
评论 #3208271 未加载