SF cops want real-time access to private security cameras for surveillance

The Mission Local covered the topic: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;missionlocal.org&#x2F;2022&#x2F;07&#x2F;surveillance-critics-blast-police-private-cameras&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;missionlocal.org&#x2F;2022&#x2F;07&#x2F;surveillance-critics-blast-...</a>

If I lived in a high-crime area, and I thought that giving police access to a camera in front of my home made me safer, I would probably do so.

Currently can&#x27;t find any reference to this in the Chron, Merc, or Mission Local.

someone wandered in, caused shit, &amp; got violent at a beer garden i was at yesterday.<p>i dislike the idea of always on cameras, cameras in the infrastructure.<p>but it did ocur to me that i wanted to be able to videocall the police right then &amp; there.

We don&#x27;t need cops seizing private cameras.<p>We just need them to <i>ARREST</i> criminals. If you steal something from the store you get arrested. If you are smoking&#x2F;injecting <i>illegal</i> schedule I and schedule II drugs you get <i>ARRESTED</i>.<p>London Breed and all the other SF politicians are working for narco-terrorist cartels. The Sinaloa cartel literally controls both the drug and fencing trade in the Tenderloin.<p>I say we send in the national guard and just start arresting every last person in city hall until we get results.<p>SF is a failed city and the politicians are narcos.