TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

GoDaddy locks out derivatives of Chrome

217 点作者 mrspence将近 3 年前
Only allows direct versions of Google Chrome, Edge, Safari and Firefox<p>See message here when using Brave, a Google Chrome (chromium) derivative: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;i.imgur.com&#x2F;MV66H85.png" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;i.imgur.com&#x2F;MV66H85.png</a><p>Triggered when trying to log in.

30 条评论

miedpo将近 3 年前
Heya, just logged into GoDaddy from Brave without any changes here, and it worked fine for me. This might be for a couple of reasons:<p>1) Perhaps GoDaddy is running a change on you that they haven&#x27;t rolled out to me yet.<p>2) Perhaps I have a somewhat long history on this computer logging in using brave and that is overriding whatever heuristics they are using for &#x27;that connection looks suspicious&#x27;. Have you logged into your account in Brave on this computer before? If so, for how long have you done so? In addition, if you turn off some of the brave shield (look at the lion in the URL bar), does the site load? It might be detecting that and using that as the heuristic that doesn&#x27;t let you in.<p>3) Perhaps Brave rolled out an update that broke something. Unusual, but happens occasionally. Are you running standard brave on Windows, and if you go to Windows-&gt;About Brave is it saying that your browse is fully up to date?<p>As a note for all the people asking why people use GoDaddy, there are two things generally:<p>1) Sometimes, you didn&#x27;t make the decision, and it&#x27;s a pain in the butt to get things swapped over especially when your bosses are used to GoDaddy.<p>2) Their phone support is miles better than most of the competition. While sometimes you run into techs who don&#x27;t help quite as much, sometimes you run into really good ones. This ratio of helpful : not helpful is quite a bit better than the competition. In addition, all of them are pretty understandable over the phone. (By the way, if any of you are looking to compete with companies like these, having good phone support really makes you stand out over the competition - you just have to make sure your support techs manage their support time well)<p>These things make them more difficult to replace.
andybak将近 3 年前
&quot;Your browser is a bit unusual&quot;.<p>Why, yes. Thank you for noticing. That is entirely intentional.<p>Welcome to the web.
评论 #32094141 未加载
rvnx将近 3 年前
This is because the browser fails to load some JS on the control panel because the browser blocks them. That&#x27;s it.
评论 #32094239 未加载
bob1029将近 3 年前
User agent discrimination will never make sense to me. It&#x27;s such a trivial thing to work around too. Are there legitimate use cases for describing yourself to the web, or could we all just hard-code the bullshit magic string chrome uses and be done with it?<p>Ad tech is the only reason I believe this garbage continues. Maybe we can hope and pray for some kind of regulatory relief on the horizon. Alternatively, we can start building services the way we know they need to be built, and quit our jobs when our dickhead MBA bosses order us to do inhumane things with the products.<p>If someone in my organization ordered me to do UA&#x2F;browser filtering for our web application, I would likely quit out of protest. The primary reason no one asks for ridiculous things like this in my organization is because they are <i>convinced that I actually will</i>. I have made it abundantly clear to the business that certain areas of technology are no-go. Being assertive about this trash fast &amp; early can keep it from becoming a thing in the first place. Clearly, not an option for every career &amp; job, but developers are in such huge demand that they have a non-zero amount of control over this destiny now.
评论 #32102486 未加载
评论 #32095880 未加载
dzek69将近 3 年前
Vivaldi stopped exposing itself via User Agent, they&#x27;re just telling they&#x27;re Chrome. A lot of issues are magically gone.
评论 #32095148 未加载
okasaki将近 3 年前
I&#x27;ve been getting that message for over a year. I don&#x27;t think it&#x27;s browser related. I tried pretty much every browser.<p>I can&#x27;t log in at home, but it works fine at work.<p>Whatever it is, I&#x27;m never using godaddy again.
评论 #32094280 未加载
mkl95将近 3 年前
GoDaddy is a well-documented garbage fire. I used them once, then switched to Namecheap and I&#x27;ve never looked back.
评论 #32095127 未加载
评论 #32095551 未加载
评论 #32094599 未加载
jakub_g将近 3 年前
To be pedantic, &quot;locks out derivates of Chrome&quot; is a bit of a stretched interpretation.<p>What most likely happens is that there is some fingerprinting JS running trying to weed out bots; and as Brave has a lot of anti-fingerprinting measures built-in, some of the tests fail.
superkuh将近 3 年前
This has been my life for a decade now. As more and more sites become exclusively applications you run in a browser (instead of websites written in HTML you look at) I&#x27;ve been blocked more and more. Intention or accident, it doesn&#x27;t really matter. The modern &quot;web&quot; is only for mega-corps and they&#x27;re done pretending it&#x27;s anything else.
henearkr将近 3 年前
Recently in GoDaddy, I&#x27;ve also had the &quot;the 2-factor authentication key failed, try to insert it again&quot; when I wanted to change important settings like the automatic renewal or the domain lock.<p>The point is, I used the <i>same</i> 2FA key to log into my account, so I <i>know</i> it works.<p>As a result I was compelled to do the intended actions through the phone by calling their support.<p>Has anybody got the same problem? Are they trying to prevent people from freely modifying their settings, or is it that somehow they want to &quot;fire me as a customer&quot;?
评论 #32096990 未加载
_notathrowaway将近 3 年前
Speaking of registars, what does HN recommend?<p>I was a happy namecheap user until they decided to go all political against Russian citizens. I am unsure as to what service I should migrate to.
评论 #32095499 未加载
评论 #32095822 未加载
评论 #32094560 未加载
评论 #32094719 未加载
评论 #32096836 未加载
评论 #32095818 未加载
评论 #32095485 未加载
评论 #32094673 未加载
评论 #32094912 未加载
评论 #32094714 未加载
评论 #32094550 未加载
评论 #32095608 未加载
评论 #32094753 未加载
shireboy将近 3 年前
I’m a Brave user and tired of Godaddy even if they fix this. What is the best alternative registrar? I just want names, possibly mail forwarding, not hosting etc.
评论 #32094586 未加载
评论 #32095537 未加载
评论 #32094478 未加载
ColinWright将近 3 年前
I&#x27;m reminded of this:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.technologizer.com&#x2F;2010&#x2F;09&#x2F;16&#x2F;the-unwelcome-return-of-best-viewed-with-internet-explorer&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.technologizer.com&#x2F;2010&#x2F;09&#x2F;16&#x2F;the-unwelcome-retur...</a><p>Also submitted here:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=32094029" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=32094029</a>
brokenkebab2将近 3 年前
This website is optimized for Netscape Navigator again
mp3geek将近 3 年前
Hey @mrspence, Enabled shields.<p>Test the following, add into brave:&#x2F;&#x2F;adblock (custom filters):<p>godaddy.com##+js(set, navigator.userAgent, &#x27;&#x27;)<p>godaddy.com##+js(set, navigator.connection, {})<p>(logout and re-login into godaddy)
V-2将近 3 年前
Works fine on Vivaldi (which is Chromium-based), unless the error is only supposed to occur after an actual logging attempt, which I can&#x27;t test without an account.<p>So I don&#x27;t doubt there&#x27;s a limitation, but it doesn&#x27;t seem to disallow every derivative browser (assuming I&#x27;m not misunderstanding you somehow).
评论 #32094376 未加载
jefftk将近 3 年前
<i>&gt; Only allows direct versions of Google Chrome, Edge, Safari and Firefox</i><p>Where are you seeing that? The error message doesn&#x27;t say that&#x27;s the problem, and it&#x27;s much more likely to be that Brave is blocking something GoDaddy uses for login.
kypro将近 3 年前
This doesn&#x27;t seem to be related to GoDaddy locking out derivatives of Chrome and is probably Brave &#x2F; browser extensions blocking certain JS scripts. I can access my account fine with Brave.
tannhaeuser将近 3 年前
Web apps were an error.
评论 #32095717 未加载
GnarfGnarf将近 3 年前
I&#x27;ve been using GoDaddy as one of my registrars for 25+ years. Their tech. support is excellent.<p>However, their recent switch to MS Office 365 &#x2F; Outlook for email has been a fiasco, and pushed me one step closer to dropping them.
评论 #32097729 未加载
sergiotapia将近 3 年前
Literally who uses godaddy on purpose. Might as well buy an oracle database instance as well.<p>use porkbun, great service that does one thing well. like postmark.
4cao将近 3 年前
Seems to still work with Ungoogled Chromium.<p>Edit: Or do you need to try to log in to get this message? (That&#x27;s what the screenshot suggests.)
smitty1e将近 3 年前
When everyone becomes adept at changing their user agent to beat these filters, what so these whiz kids do?
评论 #32094275 未加载
评论 #32095593 未加载
SamSkjord将近 3 年前
Works fine with Waterfox (with uBlock)
londons_explore将近 3 年前
Fraud rates of &#x27;other&#x27; browsers are over double that of mainstream browsers.<p>Nearly every metric is worse - from spam comment removal rate to adspam rate to credit card chargebacks.<p>I can completely understand a web host deciding to block any browser that isn&#x27;t a major one.
评论 #32094420 未加载
aussiedude将近 3 年前
I wonder if they are using some Akamai bot blocking feature.
hakube将近 3 年前
Have you tried spoofing your user agent?
itbeho将近 3 年前
Do not use GoDaddy. A horrible company in my opinion based upon experience.
gravitate将近 3 年前
Turn Shields off?
pluc将近 3 年前
You already shouldn&#x27;t be using GoDaddy, so there&#x27;s another reason
评论 #32095315 未加载
评论 #32094332 未加载
评论 #32095552 未加载
评论 #32094573 未加载