TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

In 2018 Trump warned Germany not to become dependent upon Russian Gas

12 点作者 SQL2219将近 3 年前

2 条评论

eisstrom将近 3 年前
Obama did the same in 2014<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reuters.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;us-usa-eu-summit-idUSBREA2P0W220140326" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reuters.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;us-usa-eu-summit-idUSBREA2P0...</a><p>And the Bush administration tried to prevent Nord Stream I.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.spiegel.de&#x2F;international&#x2F;world&#x2F;russia-s-energy-weapon-german-us-tensions-grow-over-baltic-pipeline-a-579677.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.spiegel.de&#x2F;international&#x2F;world&#x2F;russia-s-energy-w...</a>
dane-pgp将近 3 年前
Unfortunately there&#x27;s some cold-hearted logic in buying cheap Russian gas for years, even if you know they will use the money to fund their incremental invasion of Ukraine.<p>As long as the one-off cost of switching to another supplier (or just reopening coal power stations, and re-certifying the nuclear power stations) is less than the accumulated annual cost of buying from more expensive suppliers in a pre-emptive boycott of Russia (who would just sell their gas to somewhere else instead) then ultimately Germany is saving money.<p>Importantly, (some of) the money that Germany was saving needed to be put into its own military preparedness and stockpiles, so that the foreign policy goal of protecting Ukraine&#x27;s sovereignty could still be achieved (which would be a cost shared by other nations, including those further away from and thus less dependent on Russian gas).
评论 #32121211 未加载