Wikipedia is being manipulated, you can't trust anybody now

What is the world coming to? If you can't trust information about controversial topics posted through anonymous accounts on the internet then who can you trust?

On niche subjects where certain parties have vested interests, this is almost bound to happen. In such cases, Wikipedia is like power up-for-grabs. People who care will take it.

'Byrne has long argued that the press dismissed his views at least in part because Weiss - hiding behind various anonymous accounts - spent years controlling the relevant articles on Wikipedia, the "free online encyclopedia anyone can edit."'<p>If The Register is reporting this correctly - a long shot by current online journalism standards - then this guy is simply a crank. Who needs Wikipedia in order to get heard?

The title of this submission should be changed to that of the actual article:<p><i>Emails show journalist rigged Wikipedia's naked shorts</i>

Aw shucks!