TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Google declined to review an extension because they can’t find a Kindle to test

79 点作者 longnguyen将近 3 年前

7 条评论

filmgirlcw将近 3 年前
This is an extension for a $50 a year service for sending articles to your Kindle that as far as I can tell, is not demonstrably better than the free extension or using a service like Instapaper or Pocket.<p>So yeah, sorry they won&#x27;t feature your extension for an extremely-overpriced service dude, but crying about it on Hacker News in an attempt to drum up publicity doesn&#x27;t make me sympathetic.
评论 #32342938 未加载
zxcvgm将近 3 年前
For context, his next tweet [0] in the thread was:<p>&gt; But for an extension (with the exact same functionality) from a Big Corp, they magically found a way to test it<p>&gt; <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;chrome.google.com&#x2F;webstore&#x2F;detail&#x2F;send-to-kindle-for-google&#x2F;cgdjpilhipecahhcilnafpblkieebhea" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;chrome.google.com&#x2F;webstore&#x2F;detail&#x2F;send-to-kindle-for...</a><p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;daniel_nguyenx&#x2F;status&#x2F;1555167790796967936" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;daniel_nguyenx&#x2F;status&#x2F;155516779079696793...</a>
评论 #32342792 未加载
评论 #32342392 未加载
评论 #32342363 未加载
kgeist将近 3 年前
Note that this is not about allowing the extension in the store, it&#x27;s about showing it on the Featured page.<p>Does OP expect them to buy a Kindle to test the extension?
评论 #32342418 未加载
评论 #32342450 未加载
PragmaticPulp将近 3 年前
Before everyone jumps to conclusions, note that the extension is approved and available: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;chrome.google.com&#x2F;webstore&#x2F;detail&#x2F;ktool-send-web-aticles-to&#x2F;igfcoofpmcdpcocfofdobneaileiogmo" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;chrome.google.com&#x2F;webstore&#x2F;detail&#x2F;ktool-send-web-ati...</a><p>The author wants to apply for the “Featured” badge. There are many reasons why I don’t see this ever happening, including the fact that the name of the app includes obvious typos.<p>This isn’t just a case of Google refusing to approve someone’s extension. The Featured badge is supposed to be a more curated tier.
coolgoose将近 3 年前
I wonder if there&#x27;s a day in which Google&#x27;s app review policy isn&#x27;t fucking somebody over.<p>I understand that there are complexities at scale, but is it that hard for google to have in the manual review process somebody looking and verifying that indeed there&#x27;s another fucking app that does the same, maybe we should figure out what to do ?
评论 #32342149 未加载
评论 #32342384 未加载
1-6将近 3 年前
Perhaps the wording of the response was done wrong. It sounds like there’s a lack of tools to fully test on Amazon’s Kindle architecture.
anshumankmr将近 3 年前
What I am surprised by is that there is no way to emulate a Kindle. I