This story leaves out some details: <a href="https://nypost.com/2022/08/09/nebraska-mom-and-daughter-charged-for-burning-burying-aborted-fetus/" rel="nofollow">https://nypost.com/2022/08/09/nebraska-mom-and-daughter-char...</a><p>> When an investigator interviewed the teen, she allegedly confirmed that she had a miscarriage after midnight on April 22, and said that she and her mother placed the fetus in a bag in the back of their van, according to the court papers.<p>> Jessica and Celeste also said that Barnhill, whose relationship to the two women has not been revealed, later helped them bury the fetus on his property.<p>> Police were led to the makeshift gravesite and unearthed the corpse, which was found to show signs of “thermal injuries,” the documents stated.<p>> Barnhill reportedly confirmed to the investigators that the mother and daughter had attempted to burn the fetus before putting it in the ground.<p>My opinion might be a bit contrarian, but I was always taught that Roe v Wade was because abortions had become <i>so unsafe</i> without a proper place to do them. I imagine in this case we're missing some details, because the <i>actual</i> abortion involved sourcing some pills that are specifically used for abortion. I don't imagine sourcing those was quick. My read on this set of circumstances is that if you put arbitrary blockers on something that someone <i>really</i> wants to do, it course corrects them into a very unhealthy path. In this case, the details are shocking, but not incongruent with what I have been told was the reasoning for Roe v Wade and true to other harm reduction logic.<p>It's awful easy to argue post-facto that she could just have given birth, but I think that ignores a lot of changes and sacrifices a woman at 17-18 years old will have to endure.