I think the claims in this article are dubious.<p>For example: "Research papers are considered higher quality the more they are cited by others."<p>This may be true in general, but what if there was a "hack the system" effort whereby academics colluded to promote each others' research... say... in a highly corrupt country.<p>There has been a long term battle against corruption at universities in China.<p>For example, a quick search for: china university research corruption<p>yields several articles. If I had more time today, I'd search for one in particular which compares retracted articles due to discovery of corruption in research, in China, compared to other countries. China's rate was astounding.