TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Internet giants place full-page anti-SOPA ad in NYT

687 点作者 andrewdumont超过 13 年前

24 条评论

tomjen3超过 13 年前
If that is the kind of ads tech giants make, then we have all lost.<p>This needs more Don Draper and less wall of text. It needs to tell a compelling story with a righteous underdog fighting the good fight which would be squashed if this law passes. It needs to paint anybody who support it as a traitor to America(TH).<p>And it needs to rebrand it the "Killing the American Dream Act" so that nobody can politically afford to support it.
评论 #3250275 未加载
protomyth超过 13 年前
The tech industry has enough money to buy 10x more lobbyists than the entertainment industry. This would be a wiser investment than the ads.
评论 #3245520 未加载
评论 #3245493 未加载
评论 #3245594 未加载
评论 #3245491 未加载
评论 #3246767 未加载
thematt超过 13 年前
If Google was serious they'd put something on their front page. The readership of the New York Times is nothing compared to Google's traffic.
评论 #3245417 未加载
评论 #3245868 未加载
评论 #3245428 未加载
评论 #3246919 未加载
评论 #3245461 未加载
skb_超过 13 年前
I've been thinking a bit about this and it's more a detriment to the United States than it is to the Internet. Censorship is a losing battle, especially with an educated public. There's just no way that this can work, it's a perpetual cat and mouse at best.<p>I feel that SOPA will pass, there's no doubt in my mind - it will just be a much watered down version, much like any other bill that passes these days. Even this so-called "anti-SOPA" ad is not really anti-SOPA, it just disagrees with certain aspects of the bill. They're basically asking for a compromise and they'll get it. There will probably be a long and expensive process in order to shut sites down. There will probably be some clauses about staying up if you are compliant with take-down notices. And there will probably be more bureaucrats added to the system, with jobs that are essentially useless and another needless expense. Ultimately, it will be like the War on Drugs, War on Terror, TSA and what have you; some far-fetched, pie in the sky plan that never had a chance of working in the first place.<p>The sad part is that people in Washington don't understand the consequences of what they are doing. They seem to think they have a blank check to play around with. Slowly but surely, they add things like this and the government gets bigger and more expensive to run. You can't just fire bureaucrats, they have a knack for sticking around.<p>I can't help but feel like I'm watching the slow death of a once great nation. I haven't heard anything lately coming out of Capitol Hill that has any semblance of intelligence.
评论 #3246590 未加载
mikemoka超过 13 年前
Web companies should know how to write a readable text, it's pity they could just come up with something like that.<p>This text is not coincise, it doesn't draw the attention of the reader to any specific point and it shows several other shortcomings, if the message ever comes across I am pretty sure this page won't help.
评论 #3245613 未加载
评论 #3245387 未加载
评论 #3246439 未加载
grandalf超过 13 年前
If you're in the tech industry and you realize how stupid this proposed law is, realize that it's no more stupid than the vast majority of laws passed by congress, you're just better equipped to judge it.
评论 #3245782 未加载
panthera超过 13 年前
The ad proves the old maxim true: "Everyone's a reactionary against something they know about."<p>Nearly all of the companies listed in this ad were heavy donors to the Obama administration. Now they understand what their donation got them.<p>Everyone in the Internet industry feels extreme pain when these regulations are proposed, and rightly so. SOPA is an insane example of a bankrupt government flailing about.<p>However, the same commentariat thinks that regulation is somehow "necessary" in medicine, law, or energy.<p>("&#60;Calamity-of-the-day&#62; could have been prevented if we just had more rules on the books! Surely the evil profit-making corporations would cut every corner they could, just to make a buck! It's not like taking it in the shorts every single day in the press will hit their stock price!")<p>Once you've tasted government intervention in your industry, you'll want some mouthwash.
评论 #3246891 未加载
ck2超过 13 年前
Where is the url in there for more information/followup? Wasted opportunity.<p>I don't mean to diminish this effort but just imagine this kind of response every time we decided to declare war somewhere far far away. I'd be impressed. Certainly sending people to be maimed or killed is just as critical?
评论 #3245269 未加载
评论 #3245528 未加载
jamiequint超过 13 年前
There was also a full page ad in today's Wall Street Journal, same letter. <a href="http://pic.twitter.com/jisFPt4s" rel="nofollow">http://pic.twitter.com/jisFPt4s</a>
damoncali超过 13 年前
Am I the only one that did a double-take when I saw Zynga on there?
评论 #3245885 未加载
评论 #3245849 未加载
评论 #3246100 未加载
评论 #3245864 未加载
评论 #3246066 未加载
therandomguy超过 13 年前
I wonder if we can start a site called PoliticiansAgainstInternet.org, get it a lot of publicity and sway the votes away from them. It should be so popular that politicians will dread getting on that list. Maybe Anon can dig up more dirt and expose it on there?
评论 #3248928 未加载
bobbles超过 13 年前
95% of people would look at that wall of text and turn the page.. they really needed something that would actually draw in peoples attention if they want it to get noticed
评论 #3245699 未加载
dmboyd超过 13 年前
&#62; We support the bills’ stated goals "providing additional enforcement tools to combat foreign "rogue" websites that are dedicated to copyright infringement or counterfeiting"...<p>Why doesn't anyone just call bullshit on the whole concept of the US extending its law to apply to the rest of the world?
评论 #3246056 未加载
muppetman超过 13 年前
This is great. It's just a shame the last time anyone picked up a paper was about 10 years ago. Can't argue with the sentiment though.
评论 #3246209 未加载
评论 #3245638 未加载
baby超过 13 年前
What is also impressive is the presence of Zynga in the internet giants club.
评论 #3245615 未加载
swasheck超过 13 年前
Well played, MS and Apple.
评论 #3245460 未加载
评论 #3245212 未加载
评论 #3245361 未加载
评论 #3245234 未加载
roxtar超过 13 年前
Did anyone notice the missing Godzilla-head in Mozilla's logo?
d0mine超过 13 年前
The irony. The giants of Internet advertising spread their message via dead-tree paper ads.
评论 #3245835 未加载
评论 #3245592 未加载
natch超过 13 年前
A TLDR skim of this ad by the average NYT reader will see only this: We support the bill.<p>Yes, I omitted the words "goals of the" [edit: 's stated goals] but I'm talking about what the average reader will get out of the ad before they flip to the next page.<p>Not good, imho. And yes, they do care about the average reader. If they were trying to reach people other than the average reader, there are better ways to do that.
评论 #3246155 未加载
artursapek超过 13 年前
Very nice. It's a nice touch that the logos at the bottom are in alphabetical order. I want a copy of this
jpdoctor超过 13 年前
Full page ad? Big deal. Obviously they screwed up by not buying a bunch of senators and congressman.<p>Fools.
Igor_Bratnikov超过 13 年前
Glad to see a public stance by the internet community
sidwyn超过 13 年前
Besides the gist of the ad, I noticed that Facebook did not use their logo without a background (AOL too).
iradik超过 13 年前
Huh. Google should take out an ad on its front page!<p>Maybe censor all requests coming from the .gov domains.