I dunno, sorry, but it honestly seems kinda spammy and it doesn't tell me why I should trust any of the results... it looks and works like any other SEO-optimized "best of" spam site :(<p>"best national park" = Teton, Bryce, Zion... why does Yellowstone get 3/5 stars? No idea<p>"air fryer" = random products with generic descriptions, several of which are 3/5 stars (out of the dozens of air fryers available, why are the top 5 the mediocre ones? who's saying they're mediocre? No idea)<p>"airline to fly to thailand" = two of the five results aren't even airlines<p>"tech forum" = nearly all useless spam sites<p>"place to get programming help" = takes forever to load, but actually returned useful results (kudos!)<p>"restaurants near me" (autosuggested, pushed enter like it said) = nothing happened. UI bug that doesn't select the entry if you push enter instead of clicking on it<p>"awd suv" = many aren't even cars, and the ones that are just have manufacturer's descriptions instead of any useful comparison<p>I was excited to try your service, but to be honest, I probably would never use this again after this experience. I would not consider this even early alpha quality, much less beta, because its result sets are largely not trustworthy. The signal to noise ratio is way too low, and your algorithm is totally opaque, and there are no visible signals for me to use to evaluate the quality of your results. If I didn't have foreknowledge of a topic, I would have no way to determine whether to trust your results. Of the topics I AM familiar with, your results were not very convincing... at all. Sorry to be harsh, I hope you guys keep working on this and making it better... but maybe don't make it public yet until it gets much, much better? The first impression was negative for me.