TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Not a Coke ad; Rats fed with soda for 2 months got more stupid

11 点作者 Gaishan超过 2 年前

5 条评论

mayoi超过 2 年前
Yeah and chocolate straight up kills dogs, so what&#x27;s your point?<p>I don&#x27;t see anyone shilling against coffee which is literally a drug like alcohol and tobacco however.<p>Same people who want me to avoid sugar also want me to not use butter and instead use v*getable oils for cooking so I&#x27;m not sure why their opinion matters.<p>From all these meme studies, the only thing that I&#x27;ve learned is that you can take an obese landwhale, feed them whatever you dislike, and observe the complications totally caused by the thing you gave them and not the fact that they cannot physically move without a motorized 4 wheeled scooter which in fact has nothing to do with the type of food you eat.<p>My issue with this non-study is that it doesn&#x27;t look like they forced sugar-drinking rats to work harder than rats that didn&#x27;t gain those extra calories, nor did they mention any weight changes whatsoever. Why do I care? Because it has been proven that obesity can in fact cause brain damage. From cholesterol clogging your arteries and killing braincells that way to other random inflammations, this is the main way to turn into a vegetable. As if I need to tell you that obesity and retardation is literally inseparable. Of course, there are studies that &quot;prove&quot; that obesity doesn&#x27;t lead to lower intelligence, but I wonder how did they test this considering your intelligence has to be low to become obese in the first place.
评论 #32577121 未加载
评论 #32588382 未加载
themodelplumber超过 2 年前
&gt; A closer look at the rattos&#x27; brains confirmed that the soda groups had all sustained varying degrees of damage to the frontal cortex, which controls vital mental functions like attention, memory, and judgement, as well as the hippocampus, which plays a major role in both memory and learning.<p>It was just a tiny bit weird to read this, as someone who has been drinking a lot more soda, but also doing personality-changing frontal cortex exercises for the last 5 years.<p>(But I guess they also use the word &quot;sugary&quot; a lot here and I&#x27;ve been drinking the zero-sugar stuff, which hopefully is also zero-frontal-cortex-damage stuff.)<p>BTW they say some brain trauma can be repaired or will even naturally heal on its own; is this kind of damage also in that category?
评论 #32575389 未加载
Beltalowda超过 2 年前
There is no mention how much the rats drank, other than &quot;drank soft drink and&#x2F;or water ad libitum during 67 days&quot;. Did the rats chose coke 100% of the time? 90%? 50%? 1%? Also doesn&#x27;t mention <i>which</i> specific drink was used, which can be important (specifically, if it contains artificial sweeteners, and which).<p>I can&#x27;t view the full text though as it&#x27;s not on sci-hub and not about to pay $28 to read a single article, so the answers may be in there. But it&#x27;s not in the article or summary of the paper.
pengaru超过 2 年前
How do they disambiguate sugary drink from caffeinated drink?<p>A Coke&#x2F;Pepsi is a whole lot more than just sugar+water.
barrysteve超过 2 年前
There&#x27;s no mention of a mechanism. Very fuzzy science going by the article&#x27;s description.