TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

IPv6 support for cloning Git repositories from GitHub

245 点作者 stargrave将近 3 年前

13 条评论

pantalaimon将近 3 年前
I also don't understand what stops ycombinator from supporting IPv6. It's a pretty simple website, what's the big effort?
评论 #32582067 未加载
评论 #32588290 未加载
评论 #32582015 未加载
CottonMcKnight将近 3 年前
Considering how long it took AWS to add IPv6 to services across the board, I'm not surprised that it's taking so long. On the other hand, it would be nice if they would be transparent about the challenges or the reason for the delay, rather than radio silence or, at best, "we're working on it."
评论 #32581981 未加载
评论 #32583516 未加载
nfriedly将近 3 年前
My ISP (Metronet) uses CGNAT and refuses to touch IPv6. In my case, when I complained that port forwarding didn&#x27;t work, they gave me a static IPv4 for free, but I have to call back once a year or else they start billing me $10&#x2F;month for it.<p>I don&#x27;t need a static IP. I&#x27;d be completely fine with a dynamic IPv4 or even dynamic IPv6. But they don&#x27;t offer that. Just static IPv4 or CGNAT IPv4. Oh well, some day...
评论 #32583834 未加载
评论 #32585150 未加载
评论 #32586302 未加载
评论 #32588401 未加载
kuon将近 3 年前
For about 4 years I have considered IPv6 first and IPv4 second. If IPv6 has an issue, I consider the service down, not just half down or slightly non operational. If I call an ISP for an IPv6 issue, I say &quot;internet is down&quot; even if IPv4 is working.<p>This policy helped move things forward on the networks I worked on. Lately I did setup a business internet with SLA, I specifically told the ISP I would not accept the contract if the SLA did not mention IPv6 as required.<p>But it is still a lot of battle, where it should be the default.<p>Github not fully supporting IPv6 is a real shame and they should really move things forward to support it quickly.<p>Also, systems should not use IP addresses as a mean of security or authentication, it was a bad idea for IPv4, it is even a worst idea for IPv6. To give you an example of bad firewall behavior, I was checking my electric bill from the train, and suddenly my account got blocked, and it took me a lot of time and effort to fix (physical mail...). My IP changed while I was browsing a page and the firewall didn&#x27;t like it.
评论 #32585999 未加载
waffle_ss将近 3 年前
This shortcoming becomes immediately apparent when you try to use certain VMs, like from Vultr, which are IPv6-only with no CG-NAT. You can&#x27;t clone anything or fetch any release binaries at all.
评论 #32584078 未加载
评论 #32584389 未加载
forgot_old_user将近 3 年前
This is sad :( hetzner charges extra for ipv4 address, and this means I couldn&#x27;t run `git clone` without paying extra.
评论 #32586967 未加载
评论 #32582105 未加载
xvilka超过 2 年前
Meanwhile in both India[1] and China[2] (two biggest countries by Internet users count) IPv6 is mandated by the national policy. Everyone else should do that, otherwise the transition would never be finished. ISPs and other network businesses should be forced to do upgrades by the law or policy, otherwise they will never allocate budget and resources for that.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.indiatimes.com&#x2F;technology&#x2F;news&#x2F;india-sets-new-deadline-for-upgrading-internet-protocol-to-ipv6-heres-why-it-matters-553484.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.indiatimes.com&#x2F;technology&#x2F;news&#x2F;india-sets-new-de...</a><p>[2] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.stdaily.com&#x2F;English&#x2F;ChinaNews&#x2F;202208&#x2F;e154b19bb5b04093b9f88424bf46ac75.shtml" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.stdaily.com&#x2F;English&#x2F;ChinaNews&#x2F;202208&#x2F;e154b19bb5b0...</a>
评论 #32587822 未加载
the_mitsuhiko将近 3 年前
I think what a lot of people like to miss is that a lot of detection and antispam stuff is not working well on ipv6. A server without any ipv4 is still limited in many more ways than not being able to reach github which probably means there is not a lot of pressure for github yet.
评论 #32582968 未加载
dwheeler将近 3 年前
Lots of organizations do not support IPv6. For another example, Heroku does not (and many systems are based on Heroku): <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;help.heroku.com&#x2F;I8L6RW01&#x2F;does-heroku-support-ipv6" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;help.heroku.com&#x2F;I8L6RW01&#x2F;does-heroku-support-ipv6</a><p>It&#x27;s unfortunately harder to support IPv6 than I think it should be, so many organizations do not. I&#x27;d love to see GitHub support IPv6, but they are by no means the only one.
flas9sd将近 3 年前
from the NAT64 gateway in the thread I learned from ipv4 mapped ipv6 addresses<p><pre><code> 2001:67c:27e4:1064::140.82.121.3 github.com www.github.com </code></pre> if your curious too, see <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.rfc-editor.org&#x2F;rfc&#x2F;rfc6052#section-2.4" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.rfc-editor.org&#x2F;rfc&#x2F;rfc6052#section-2.4</a>
评论 #32588186 未加载
dark-star超过 2 年前
I have a dual stack DSL connection and do not particularly favor IPv4 or IPv6. But I just looked at my PiHole DNS statistics and I see that AAAA requests have taken over A requests by now, 47.2% vs 46.2%. Not much but it&#x27;s something.<p>I wasn&#x27;t aware that over half of my internet traffic goes over IPv6 already
评论 #32587726 未加载
评论 #32587682 未加载
sebazzz将近 3 年前
Well, if Github nowadays runs on Azure under the hood (which they probably don&#x27;t) I understand. IPv6 support in Azure is patchy with many of their services.
评论 #32587667 未加载
pelorat将近 3 年前
Because of this post I decided to check my network interface statistics. I&#x27;m in the Netherlands and my IPv6 usage is ~10x that of IPv4.
评论 #32592420 未加载