TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

200+ Labels Withdraw Their Music From Spotify: Are Its Fortunes Unravelling?

50 点作者 glymor超过 13 年前

14 条评论

mbesto超过 13 年前
<i>Add to that the feeling that their music loses its specialness by its exploitation as a low value/free commodity.</i><p>Interesting quote. Is music production being exploited as a low value commodity, or is it in reality a low-value commodity? With the insane amount of music that is available I personally feel like it's the latter, and the reverse exploitation of publishers/distributors has gone on for too long.
评论 #3261014 未加载
评论 #3261327 未加载
评论 #3261101 未加载
评论 #3261020 未加载
评论 #3261669 未加载
akmiller超过 13 年前
<i>more than 200 labels has withdrawn its entire catalogue from Spotify, Napster, Simfy and Rdio.</i><p>Somewhat sensationalist headline trying to make it sound like it's Spotify that's losing these labels when in reality it's the labels opting out of ALL subscription based music services. Not to say that it's not a huge problem but there is no need to single out Spotify in the title.
评论 #3261704 未加载
philwelch超过 13 年前
"because it turns a service that has everything into a service that has “most stuff”"<p>Spotify already was a service that has "most stuff"--it was never a challenge to find holes in their catalog.<p>And judging from the ads that the free version of Spotify plays for me, either their entire userbase is really into country, or their advertising is more intended to badger me into buying a subscription so albums I actually like aren't interrupted by country music every 2-3 tracks.
评论 #3261111 未加载
waterlesscloud超过 13 年前
I have a strong suspicion that these particular "labels" mostly have 1 artist on them.
评论 #3260938 未加载
ssharp超过 13 年前
If someone is going to solve the music problem, the business model should be as focused on addressing the concerns of labels and artists as it is on consumers. If the middleman is making customers happy, and artist/labels feel like their getting an equitable fee, lock-in will happen and it will become a strategic disadvantage to leave.<p>It's far too easy to say "give the customers what they want. Your model is antiquated, catch up!" That isn't solving a problem. If we only look at the consumer end, we're bound to end up with lots of models that don't interest labels and artists, and ultimately will not satisfy customers either. If the ultimate destination is a world where we largely marginalize labels (which seems to be something a lot of people advocate as it will push costs down), then does Spotify get us any closer to that goal? Not as it stands now.
评论 #3261557 未加载
AndrewDucker超过 13 年前
I'd love to know whether Spotify was generally causing an increase or a decrease in the amount spent on music.<p>I'm currently spending £120/year on music that I wasn't spending before, but I'm aware that I might not be normal.
评论 #3261130 未加载
评论 #3261221 未加载
评论 #3261126 未加载
评论 #3260915 未加载
评论 #3261041 未加载
fauldsh超过 13 年前
This is truly the big problem with Spotify. They're completely at the mercy of the big labels/distributors, who aren't receiving enough money for Spotify to matter to them that much. Whereas Spotify completely cannot afford for labels to pull their music.<p>The problem is beyond sheer numbers of subscribers as well, Spotify needs people to listen to less, so that the money generated per song play increases and makes them a more attractive distribution medium. Radio stations do this by having DJ's talk lots between songs and varying the popularity of the songs they play, so they don't play too many new and expensive songs. The only tool Spotify has to alter the revenue per song play is changing the subscription price.
waldr超过 13 年前
I wonder how many new fans those artists got from being on spotify, how many people then paid to see them live and recommended them to their friends. It's difficult to put a price on that.
gcp超过 13 年前
This is a gamble that can turn both ways; what these labels/artists now risk is that they basically no longer exist, or are no longer discoverable, for a large portion of listeners.
评论 #3261303 未加载
mvkel超过 13 年前
Oof. The sole reason I have a Spotify subscription is for its vast dubstep catalog. Checking out my "favorites" playlist today, I hope I don't see half of them gone!
评论 #3260960 未加载
JonnieCache超过 13 年前
When I read this I was <i>not</i> expecting it to be STholdings! That's about half of my favorite new music right there. Glad I didn't buy a subscription now.
bookwormAT超过 13 年前
If more gaps in Spotify's library really makes people purchase albums again?<p>I know it makes me switch to Grooveshark.
eyko超过 13 年前
Scumbag STHoldings. Withdraws music from Spotify. Available in Soundcloud.
评论 #3261800 未加载
cjstewart88超过 13 年前
IMO Spotify is overrated, www.tubalr.com is where its at.