TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Is SLS Worth the Cost?

33 点作者 abrax3141超过 2 年前

12 条评论

thepasswordis超过 2 年前
Estimated project cost is $13B<p>Or: about 130,000 $100k single family homes.<p>In other words, you could build and gift a single family home to nearby every single homeless person in California for this cost of this rocket.<p>Would I rather waste money on a redundant, congressional committee rocket, or waste money giving people houses?<p>Without spacex, the rocket is worthwhile. But with spacex, it is a complete waste of time and money.
评论 #32640221 未加载
评论 #32640248 未加载
评论 #32640317 未加载
评论 #32640088 未加载
评论 #32640218 未加载
评论 #32640357 未加载
评论 #32640566 未加载
评论 #32640314 未加载
评论 #32640499 未加载
elmerfud超过 2 年前
It&#x27;s a rocket built by congressional committee. Therefore it will never be worth the cost, but we&#x27;ll keep funding it because it&#x27;s a jobs program and not a lot more than that.
评论 #32640115 未加载
评论 #32639898 未加载
评论 #32640582 未加载
tycho-newman超过 2 年前
America makes like $20 trillion in new goods and services every year. We are so past the point of caring about $13 billion.<p>Want to cut costs? We have 14 nuclear deterrent submarines that cost $20 billion each. Their only job is to end the world. I think we could do that with just five subs.
elif超过 2 年前
the most elaborate historic reenactment in history.<p>we learn nothing from these experiments. they are a show because presidents are tired of being trolled about the moon.
评论 #32640253 未加载
评论 #32640264 未加载
评论 #32640415 未加载
评论 #32640342 未加载
anonym29超过 2 年前
I was very disappointed that this wasn&#x27;t a price&#x2F;performance breakdown of the Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG compared to other vehicles in the same segment.
xnx超过 2 年前
The question is always: Compared to what? Housing? Multi-state jobs program? JWST 2? More bombs? etc.
SeanLuke超过 2 年前
No.<p>This seems to be a straightforward example of Betteridge&#x27;s law.
abrax3141超过 2 年前
TL;DR: No
foreigner超过 2 年前
TL;DR: Spacex is literally 4000x cheaper but maybe SLS is worth it because of warm fuzzies.
评论 #32640881 未加载
评论 #32640265 未加载
评论 #32640249 未加载
评论 #32645293 未加载
Yizahi超过 2 年前
As a lesson how NOT to spend money, maybe yes. Two best case scenarios for SLS - it will either blow up without crew, or it will be voluntarily put in the museum. In the Museum of American Finance.
ralusek超过 2 年前
In the absence of SpaceX,&quot;worth&quot; was basically defined as &quot;how important tax payers find this vs what it costs.&quot; Now we actually have a market framework capable of answering this question. Assuming Starship works, then the answer is obviously &quot;no.&quot;
评论 #32639957 未加载
评论 #32639950 未加载
评论 #32640335 未加载
speakfreely超过 2 年前
&gt; So is the cost of the SLS, and the Artemis program as a whole, worth it? Maybe. If Artemis accomplishes all that it has set out to accomplish over the next 10 years or more, that &quot;maybe&quot; could shift to a &quot;probably.&quot; Once SpaceX&#x27;s Starship is launching as often as the company hopes, it&#x27;s possible we&#x27;ll see a cancellation of Artemis similar to that of Apollo. But the difference, hopefully, would be the emergence of a bold and flourishing space industry to cement the obsolescence of SLS, letting a new age of human exploration blossom, rather than another 50 years of human spaceflight stagnation, in which people never venture beyond low Earth orbit.<p>This article is so confused. It keeps referencing Artemis as if it is the catalyst for re-developing an American passion for spaceflight. If anything, it&#x27;s a giant symbol of government apathy and inefficiency. It&#x27;s like someone is really intent on giving NASA credit for everything that SpaceX has done in the last decade.
评论 #32640052 未加载