Decoding AWS Reserved Instances

This year some of my RIs became useless to me with a chunk of the 3-year term remaining, due to the EC2-Classic shutdown. (The instance types were a couple of generations old, and no longer available in the same availability zones in the VPC network.) Since understandably no one on the marketplace wanted to buy them, I asked AWS to credit me for the unused time on the RIs, with a promise that I'd spend the credit on new RIs on the latest generation hardware. They kept saying no -- RIs are a commitment, even if they become worthless due to their own mandates, apparently. I spent 40 days on a support ticket in which they'd go silent for a week at a time and then come back with an offer for a credit conditioned on me committing to buy way more RIs than I need. Finally they just bought my unused RIs from me on the marketplace at their full value. An acceptable outcome, but I should never have had to fight AWS for this credit.

It probably would have been better if AWS had called them &quot;reservations&quot; rather than &quot;reserved instances&quot;.<p>NB they would never call it a lease or rental because those terms have legal repercussions in some jurisdictions.<p>A reserved instance is simply pre-paying for a specific amount of EC2. AWS is able to discount this because: 1. You&#x27;re pre-paying 2. You might not use all the resources you&#x27;re entitled to, if you don&#x27;t keep a running EC2 instance &quot;filling&quot; the reserved instance slot. 3. You&#x27;re helping them with capacity planning and capacity management; there&#x27;s no guesswork involved with your workload.

It is great to see articles like this, as Reserved Instances are a fantastic way to save some money, and they are widely misunderstood.<p>I work for a company [0] that specialises in Cloud FinOps, and I helped write our in-house billing system, which has to deal with _all_ of the intricacies of Reserved Instances, so I know very well how deep this rabbit hole goes.<p>This article opens by categorising RIs as &quot;one of the most complex but crucial AWS offerings&quot;, but I think it perhaps glosses over some of that complexity, which might cause people to get burnt. For example, it suggests that you can safely sell your way out of trouble on the RI Marketplace, but in many cases you can&#x27;t: there are 5 products you can buy RIs for (EC2, RDS, ElastiCache, OpenSearch, and Redshift), but the RI Marketplace only lets you sell EC2 RIs, and only Standard EC2 RIs at that, not Convertible.<p>I don&#x27;t want to take anything away from this article, nor do I want to frighten people away from buying RIs, but please take care. If you aren&#x27;t sure, I encourage you to use one of the many companies operating in this space to help you out (and you certainly don&#x27;t have to give away 20% of your savings to do that).<p>0: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;strategic-blue.com" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;strategic-blue.com</a>

Cool to see Vantage mentioned here! I work for them, mainly on the ec2instances.info site.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.vantage.sh&#x2F;autopilot&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.vantage.sh&#x2F;autopilot&#x2F;</a> has many details on how our RI management program works. We recently added Autopilot Controls which lets you specify categories of instances (like c5) or regions that you want managed.<p>One note on buybacks: they are usually capped. I believe most providers cap their &quot;guarantee&quot; around $20K.

This article talks about the financial pros and cons of reserved instances, but not the important operational benefit:<p>You will always get an instance when you need it, and never get an error about not having enough instances of a certain type.<p>This is critical if you are using autoscaling, especially during an outage. If you are shifting your workload from one region to another at the same time as everyone else, if you have reservations and they don&#x27;t, you&#x27;ll get the instances before anyone else.<p>It breaks the whole &quot;pay as you go&quot; cloud model, but as long as you can find batch jobs to fill those reserved instances 1&#x2F;3 of the time, you&#x27;ll still come out ahead.

Azure&#x27;s Reservations are far superior. Whether you pay up front or monthly doesn&#x27;t change the cost (there&#x27;s no &quot;interest&quot;) and you can cancel the reservation early without this &quot;marketplace&quot; nonsense.<p>It makes Reservations a no-brainer on Azure. The pitfalls with AWS make it a little more murky.

&gt; Businesses can sell RIs they’ve purchased, setting their own price for the remainder of the contract.<p>You can&#x27;t sell convertible RIs, I thought? Would love to find out that&#x27;s wrong.<p>From what I&#x27;ve seen RIs are a trap, suitable to hardly anyone, especially not startups. If your infra is elastic or evolving at all, be really careful before going for RIs. And I would never go for more than a one year reserve.<p>(maybe if you are deploying K8s over RIs it&#x27;s fine, you&#x27;ll be able to utilise at least partially even if your infra changes - but if you have workload-per-instance or service-per-instance then be careful)

Reserved instances are effectively a financial construct.<p>A lot of human hours go into managing them, buying them, selling them, making sure they are efficiently used, etc.<p>I do wonder if the human effort invested in such things is actually a net gain over a fixed price. Clearly there is gain for the companies using RI&#x27;s, but is there gain for the economy as a whole?

&gt; Reserved Instances are a major piece of AWS Billing, accounting for $100B in revenue along side Saving Plans (SPs).<p>I think I know what you mean, but this reads like Reserved Instances earn AWS $100 billion&#x2F;year which is almost impossible. I don&#x27;t even think AWS earns that much annually.

Great to see <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.usage.ai&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.usage.ai&#x2F;</a> mentioned here. I&#x27;m the founder &amp; CEO, happy to answer any questions here.

This is written from an interesting angle and I&#x27;m not sure who it is meant to serve. It &quot;and then&#x27;s&quot; Savings Plans but for the majority Saving Plans replace RI and are infinitely more flexible and easy to use.<p>TLDR if you are choosing RI&#x27;s over Saving Plans the basic info conveyed in this article is probably already know if you don&#x27;t you should probably just be choosing saving plans.