TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

USB-C naming to somehow get worse with USB4 Version 2.0

57 点作者 thg超过 2 年前

9 条评论

joshstrange超过 2 年前
Can someone give a legitimate reason for this madness? I thought we were past the hell of &quot;USB 3.1 gen 1&quot;&#x2F;&quot;USB 3.1 gen 2&quot;.<p>Why is every standards body seemingly incapable of sane naming? The same thing just happened with WiFi semi-recently.<p>&quot;WiFi 6&quot;: Oh thankfully we have sane naming after years of B&#x2F;G&#x2F;AC&#x2F;AX&#x2F;etc<p>&quot;WiFi 6E&quot;: WTF were they thinking?
评论 #32682742 未加载
评论 #32682693 未加载
评论 #32687295 未加载
aappleby超过 2 年前
I propose we ignore the current names and just go with &quot;USB-C 40G 100W&quot; or &quot;USB-A 5G 10W&quot; or whatever.<p>The current naming is silly and unhelpful.
评论 #32684381 未加载
评论 #32684308 未加载
评论 #32683697 未加载
scarface74超过 2 年前
In my search for a “universal USB C” cable I have found.<p>- you have to make sure they support the wattage requirements you need.<p>- you have to make sure it isn’t power only and supports data.<p>- you have to make sure it supports the data speed you need<p>- you have to make sure it supports video over USB C - I have a portable USB C monitor.
评论 #32684595 未加载
cestith超过 2 年前
When can we just have three-part versions? USB 4.0.1 anyone? Right now, they&#x27;re making a joke of the &quot;Universal&quot; in &quot;Universal Serial Bus&quot;, unless their point is all of it can fall back to 12 Mbps.
mrjin超过 2 年前
There is simply no such a thing as one size for all but unfortunately USB-C was created for that.<p>Differences between all those different standards and&#x2F;or variants are huge and thus doesn&#x27;t really matter how you name them, it&#x27;s for sure going to be messy. Making it worse, they keep adding more sh*ts to it.<p>I used to know all my cables on which can do what. Since USB-C, I seriously became no idea at all, they all look the same, but differences are just like heaven and hell.
DarthNebo超过 2 年前
They should stop backward compatibility beyond a certain point. Just converge at USB 5. Any updates should be directly to 6 or whatever.
评论 #32687330 未加载
Havoc超过 2 年前
If only we had a consortium of sorts naming this stuff in a sensible manner…
olliej超过 2 年前
I’m waiting for USB-C (B)
rektide超过 2 年前
The ongoing ability to never name anything consistently or well has to be a sick inside joke at USB-IF. This isn&#x27;t <i>entirely</i> new. USB 3.1 Gen 2, which latter became USB 3.2 2x1, is sort of similar-ish in pattern. They&#x27;re iterating &amp; trying something new again! But I&#x27;m imagining saying something like &quot;USB 3.2 2.0&quot;. We seem about there. Yeah that don&#x27;t seem great.<p>Anyhow, super excited for this change. I love love love that home networking is futzing around with 2.5Gbps, but USB4+ has direct host-to-host attach at data-center speeds. The distance is way less but often people just want to plug their laptop into their NAS, and now there&#x27;s amazing options built in on most computers (waiting for more NAS applicances!).<p>&gt; <i>USB4 Version 2.0 has also been updated to feature the latest versions of the DisplayPort standard and PCIe spec</i><p>Still love so much that we can tunnel all kinds of other protocols (DisplayPort, Thunderbolt, &amp;c). Yeah, it&#x27;s chaotic, but I <i>love</i> this chaos. Good chaos. Lots of possibilities chaos.
评论 #32683231 未加载
评论 #32683686 未加载
评论 #32684056 未加载