TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Hydrogen battery startup says it has $700M order backlog

73 点作者 Nazzareno超过 2 年前

11 条评论

xcskier56超过 2 年前
Been thinking (daydreaming) a lot about a fully off-grid house and how in the summer, you get more solar than you need and in the winter you use much more electricity than you produce. What I&#x27;d love to see is some sort of system that used batteries for short term storage, and then during the summer, would convert excess energy to a long-term storage format like methane or LNG.<p>I have not run any numbers on this, but the idea behind it is to stockpile your energy in the summer to be able to make it through the winter without having to resort to some outside source of energy like wood or gas delivery.<p>I initially thought about hydrogen, but given it&#x27;s storage density, and the problems that SLS has had with leaks, taking the additional step to convert into methane would greatly simplify storage and use, and likely improve reliability since you&#x27;d be able to use COTS products for natural gas instead of custom hydrogen storage
评论 #32752391 未加载
评论 #32752537 未加载
评论 #32752028 未加载
评论 #32752164 未加载
评论 #32752321 未加载
评论 #32751999 未加载
评论 #32752659 未加载
评论 #32752021 未加载
评论 #32752924 未加载
评论 #32752145 未加载
评论 #32751936 未加载
评论 #32752535 未加载
评论 #32752194 未加载
评论 #32752297 未加载
评论 #32752196 未加载
评论 #32753729 未加载
评论 #32753073 未加载
评论 #32752455 未加载
rch超过 2 年前
&gt; To date, only prototypes of the Lavo domestic system have been built, and the company has not yet decided where to build a factory.
评论 #32753569 未加载
controversial97超过 2 年前
If that thing goes seriously wrong it could be an impressive incendiary device.<p>I would want that to be in it&#x27;s own separate brick outhouse or on a concrete pad twenty feet from anything that should not be sprayed with fire.<p>See this video of taking apart a USB power pack that runs on hydrogen.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=y48wCuC3KcA" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=y48wCuC3KcA</a><p>Lavo seems to be claiming that one of their devices will last 30 years, which is better than a flooded lead acid battery system, if that is actually true.
评论 #32752484 未加载
评论 #32752029 未加载
discordance超过 2 年前
I admire the audacity and the inventiveness of Lavo, but buying these seems nuts to me.<p>A 40 kWh LiFePO4 battery + grid tie inverter can be had for much less. Safe, well tested and already in high volume manufacturing. Shipped to your door tomorrow.
评论 #32755753 未加载
评论 #32752001 未加载
评论 #32752240 未加载
评论 #32760290 未加载
评论 #32751596 未加载
mgkimsal超过 2 年前
Might be a dumb question, but would they be profitable?<p>I worked at a small company that had $1.5M in &#x27;backorders&#x27;. But it was going to take more than $1.5M to fulfill the orders, which ... is not a place you want to be in (regardless of how many zeroes?). Half the company was laid off shortly after this &#x27;milestone&#x27; was reached.<p>Now.. perhaps with more zeroes... there&#x27;s seemingly enough wiggle room to move stuff around in the books to balance things out...?<p>Also, I realize it might be premature asking that type of question, but... having been burned once, it sticks to top of mind.
评论 #32752843 未加载
gamblor956超过 2 年前
A lot of people didn&#x27;t read the article before commenting.<p>1) This battery is not affected by hydrogen embrittlement, in which hydrogen reacts with metals to form hydrides, and is not explosive like compressed hydgrogen, because it stores hydrogen in the form of metal hydrides (but note that hydrides are still very flammable). They did not disclose what metal(s) are used for storage.<p>2) They don&#x27;t have a factory, but have been in talks to outsource the actual manufacture of the utility-scale version of the product.
controversial97超过 2 年前
It appears that this system turns tapwater into hydrogen and oxygen by electrolysis.<p>I&#x27;m not a chemist, but I messed around with electrolysis decades ago when I was a teen who was into chemistry sets.<p>I am not convinced that tapwater is anywhere near pure enough that this system can work without frequently changing electrodes and removing gunge, even with some filtering.<p>Electrolysis does not just split the water molecules, there is a chemical reaction with whatever else is dissolved in the water.
评论 #32754642 未加载
ngcc_hk超过 2 年前
Does it leak? It is a solid state and I guess unlike the nasa liquid one and no senator become the administrator game etc, it is easier. But at least someone has to ask the question. Hence, does it leak?<p>The other issue is how it compete with lithium battery it also used. May be unlike car …
jryb超过 2 年前
I&#x27;ve always wondered why this kind of thing wasn&#x27;t available much earlier. We&#x27;ve had electrolysis for a long time now - are fuel cells the limiting technology here? Are electrolyzers not as simple as I expect?
评论 #32751858 未加载
评论 #32751876 未加载
评论 #32751906 未加载
评论 #32751843 未加载
Kasutaja11超过 2 年前
Patents for such things that would help humanity and earth get better should be invalidated. Fuck your profits, let&#x27;s have better battery tech. Patent your iphone round corners all you want
panick21_超过 2 年前
And there are 10s of EV firms with billions in orders.