i’m curious, do objects appear to your senses, or do your senses (and predilections) appear to objects?<p>> rescues the a priori origin of the pure concepts of the understanding and the validity of the general laws of nature as laws of the understanding, in such a way that their use is limited only to experience, because their possibility has its ground merely in the relation of the understanding to experience, however, not in such a way that they are derived from experience, but that experience is derived from them, a completely reversed kind of connection which never occurred to Hume. (ibid.)<p>> Appearances certainly provide cases from which a rule is possible in accordance with which something usually happens, but never that the succession is necessary; therefore, a dignity pertains to the synthesis of cause and effect that cannot be empirically expressed at all, namely, that the effect does not merely follow upon the cause but is posited through it and follows from it.<p>[1]<a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-hume-causality/" rel="nofollow">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-hume-causality/</a>