TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

GitLab SaaS Free Tier FAQ

71 点作者 stefanoco超过 2 年前

13 条评论

Aeolun超过 2 年前
&gt; Additional units can be purchased from the GitLab Customer Portal at $60&#x2F;year for 10GB<p>$6&#x2F;year per GB. My Backblaze costs me $0.06&#x2F;year per GB, so it’s only a factor of 100 more expensive.<p>Am I the only one that thinks that’s pretty insane?<p>What I think is even stranger, is that the number of users you pay for apparently has no effect on your storage allowance. Whether there’s 1 or a 100 accounts, the limit is the same.
评论 #32823619 未加载
评论 #32822749 未加载
评论 #32822517 未加载
评论 #32825146 未加载
fariszr超过 2 年前
GitLab really needs to work on their marketing and their pricing page.<p>On GitHub, they show their generous open source limits first,(Unlimited actions, Unlimited members, GitHub pages, etc)<p>While on GitLab, the first thing you see, 5 users limits and 400 minutes limit, which are nothing compared to GtiHub.<p>Then under a small FAQ link you can find the actually generous limits for FOSS:<p>&gt; What is changing with user limits? A. There will be a 5-user limit for top-level namespaces with private visibility. At this time, top-level namespaces with public visibility will not have a user limit<p>OP&#x27;s link.<p>&gt; Yes. Public projects created after 2021-07-17 will have an allocation of CI&#x2F;CD pipeline minutes as follows: Free tier - 50,000 minutes, Premium tier - 1,250,000 minutes, Ultimate tier - 6,250,000.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;about.gitlab.com&#x2F;pricing&#x2F;#why-do-i-need-to-enter-credit-debit-card-details-for-free-pipeline-minutes" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;about.gitlab.com&#x2F;pricing&#x2F;#why-do-i-need-to-enter-cre...</a><p>I didn&#x27;t know that the 5 member limits applies only to private projects. And a big part of the reason I signed up, because they give you a lot of CI&#x2F;CD minutes for FOSS, although the Visa requirement is very annoying.
评论 #32823506 未加载
评论 #32823511 未加载
nakedgremlin超过 2 年前
We&#x27;ve been struggling with this GitLab storage change, even consulting with GitLab reps on strategy logic between namespace versus repositories. It&#x27;s still very confusing, especially if you were using their other offerings like CI&#x2F;CD build systems and associated build artifacts storage.<p>The artifacts storage is that one that&#x27;s just tough to figure out when dealing with large builds. We have already offloaded all our CI&#x2F;CD to our own hosted GitLab runners, but apparently storing the artifacts afterwards (which by default GitLab always stores the most recent builds) MUST use their storage, we can&#x27;t offload it to our own servers.<p>The instructions for removing the most recent artifacts also just never works (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.gitlab.com&#x2F;ee&#x2F;ci&#x2F;pipelines&#x2F;job_artifacts.html#keep-artifacts-from-most-recent-successful-jobs" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.gitlab.com&#x2F;ee&#x2F;ci&#x2F;pipelines&#x2F;job_artifacts.html#k...</a>)<p>So in our monorepo with multiple Windows and Mac applications, we are now stuck with lots of GB that are just there, currently unable to delete.<p>This is causing us to dramatically revisit our strategy of using GitLab and might force us to other tools.
评论 #32825008 未加载
tomxor超过 2 年前
For teams that only need git hosting the recent price hikes are complete nuts... changed from 0$ to 20$ per user &#x2F; per month, i.e $240 per user &#x2F; per year - this represents about a 120x difference in price compared to self hosting for my team. I get that their business model was based upon CI and ancillary integrations (which I have no need for), but I would have been happy to pay a reasonable base rate for git hosting... to me this price is just a &quot;go away&quot; signal for anyone not interested in CI and containers.<p>I&#x27;m switching to self hosting, at the cost of 0.25 users in gitlab world - with a lot more resources (I noticed they throttle cloning). Thankfully gitea exists because it sounds like gitlab is a nightmare to self host anyway.
评论 #32823861 未加载
评论 #32824118 未加载
kuschku超过 2 年前
And yet again it&#x27;s crypto miners abusing public resources and leading to stricter rules for everyone :(
评论 #32830811 未加载
kcmastrpc超过 2 年前
This is what happens when you start losing business to competition: put a price tag on services that were once free to generate new revenue streams.
评论 #32823529 未加载
Donckele超过 2 年前
I got the email several weeks ago - and I still don’t fully understand what it means! Unbelievable confusion.<p>PLEASE can someone in plain english say what the limits are PER REPOSITORY? Is it 5GB per repository? can you have as many repositories as you want? I don’t care or use namespaces.
评论 #32823245 未加载
评论 #32823485 未加载
Kelteseth超过 2 年前
&gt; If you require 15GB storage, you will pay $120 for the year.<p>This sounds like a lot, just so I can keep my native Windows&#x2F;Linux&#x2F;MacOS builds online. My current usage need is 14.9gb.
评论 #32822412 未加载
评论 #32822188 未加载
stefanoco超过 2 年前
Seems like free tier limitations <i>does not apply</i> to a public group as top namespace, that contains private subgroups and repositories. This would kind of help a lot!
评论 #32822777 未加载
评论 #32822568 未加载
geodel超过 2 年前
Sounds reasonable. In general I think price for any cloud based service will go up until <i>Cloud is obvious solution</i> stop being applied in all contexts.
siscia超过 2 年前
Anytime I read about price increases with gitlab I am wondering if we should just have a well designed python library for all our CI needs.
rwky超过 2 年前
I&#x27;m fine with this would have minded an extra month&#x27;s notice but fine with it. It is free after all!
评论 #32822360 未加载
ttoinou超过 2 年前
How painful is it to self host Gitlab on your own server ? Number of hours of maintenance per month