TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Not everyone has an internal monologue

10 点作者 scottydelta超过 2 年前

5 条评论

mikelevins超过 2 年前
I have an internal monologue sometimes, and sometimes I don&#x27;t. It depends on what I&#x27;m doing.<p>If I&#x27;m trying to think of how to say something, then I have an internal monologue that I use to try out ways of saying it. Similarly, if I&#x27;m thinking about how to write dialog or exposition for a story or for technical writing, then I have an internal monologue in which I construct drafts of what to say.<p>Also, in any nontrivial conversation, I prefer to try out sentences or sentence fragments mentally before uttering them. This habit contributes to me being an insufferable interrupter because if I get one constructed that says what I want it to, I then want to utter it, quick!, before I forget it. I&#x27;m not laboring under the delusion that my utterances are so very important, but the impulse to say something once I&#x27;ve got it constructed more or less properly is strong.<p>If I&#x27;m thinking about how to walk or drive somewhere, my thoughts are nonverbal--mostly 3D images or &quot;spatializations&quot; (that is, mental constructions of spatial relationships without any particular color, texture, or other visual content).<p>If I&#x27;m thinking about composing music, I may hear passages performed on various favorite instruments, or, like the low-content visualizations I mentioned, I may imagine melodies and harmonies without any specific timbre.<p>I guess my thinking is multimodal, depending on what I&#x27;m trying to think about.<p>My sense is that, generally speaking, if there is an imagined voice uttering words, or an imagined instrument playing notes, or an image or landscape with colors, it&#x27;s always a rendering or translation of something more fundamental that lies behind it. I don&#x27;t know whether that&#x27;s accurate, or how I could know for sure.
wruza超过 2 年前
I’m still not sure if I have one. I prefer to read texts with voice (not mine usually, I simulate some recent narrator), probably because my memory works much better with speech.<p>When I think about routine, the voice is either too dim or it’s just shadows of words mixed with images and concepts. E.g. going to gym or a clinic doesn’t involve “I must take a shower, grab my belongings, plan a route, …”. It is a sequence of snapshots or highlights, which helps to quickly check if all goes well. Me in a shower, me looking at a bag, me riding a taxi, etc. Words only play as directives like “need to take ids&#x2F;contract with me”, which I explicitly emphasize to remember better.<p>But when I think about my job (programming), words are the least effective instrument. I use them, but they are mostly syntactically equivalent to a program, it’s hard to say that it’s a coherent speech, instruction or description of some sort. As with routine, words help to anchor key points and write down todos. But there is <i>no</i> clear monologue in my head like “I install a new package and an import it in that source file, then I will use a function from it to convert my data into X”.<p>If you have an internal monologue, maybe we can share ~verbatim examples to compare?
评论 #32822829 未加载
beardyw超过 2 年前
Obviously this could not have existed before there was a useable language. So why would it be so prevalent? In my mind is something visual more often than language based. Visualisation is likely to have a longer history.
评论 #32824386 未加载
karmakaze超过 2 年前
For some people the difference is that they&#x27;re like people who have internal monologue, but they say everything out loud so it&#x27;s not internal. Others have semi-internal dialogue, where only one &#x27;voice&#x27; is spoken out loud, like listening to someone on a phone.<p>I would say that I have non-linguistic monologue, usually of the logical or conceptual varieties. Or rather it&#x27;s merely in a different non-word-based language.
kbelder超过 2 年前
Their bicameral mind hasn&#x27;t broken down.