TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The End of Software

5 点作者 ngalaiko超过 2 年前

4 条评论

Cryptonic超过 2 年前
My Alexa cannot even find the right episode of paw patrol no matter how hard I try to say episode 84...<p>Also I&#x27;ve never seen a stakeholder being able to expressing clearly what they want. To get a somewhat usefully specification it&#x27;s an uphill battle. Programming is almost trivial after that
评论 #32848921 未加载
Version467超过 2 年前
I wrote a long comment detailing why I think this won’t work at all, certainly not in the next five years. But I realized that the article isn’t that far off, it just got one detail wrong. If the imagined future comes to be, Apps don’t make sense as a concept anymore. If we have AI that can generate an app for any use case that I might have, then we also have AI that can just do the thing. No need for bespoke interfaces.<p>That is a future I find much more reasonable. But looking at the state of AI Assistants today I still have a very hard time believing that this will come to be in the next 5 years. But in 20 years? Sure, why not.
selfhoster11超过 2 年前
Yeah, no. This might work for 80% of software (via the 80&#x2F;20 rule), but the other 20%? You really think that an AI will be able to generate a stock trading system, or a high-performance web browser? I don&#x27;t think this is possible in 10 years (barring AGI), let alone 5.<p>Some smartphone apps barely count as software. Equating them to all software that exists, is almost insulting to me.
mdmglr超过 2 年前
So far my career has been secured by the small details, edge cases and the field of scientific computing. I think these tools will not work well for the latter.<p>But I’m still planning my career change. Not because of AI.<p>If the level of complexity in todays development is any indicator I probably can’t do this past 40.
评论 #32849357 未加载