TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

EU: Copyright Doesn't Cover Functionality, Programming Language

141 点作者 thomholwerda超过 13 年前

5 条评论

_delirium超过 13 年前
Fwiw, the question here seems to be pretty close to the "API copyright" question currently being litigated in the U.S. as one aspect of the Java/Dalvik lawsuit between Oracle and Google. HN discussions on that point: <a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2916735" rel="nofollow">http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2916735</a> / <a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2996084" rel="nofollow">http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2996084</a>
评论 #3290671 未加载
calpaterson超过 13 年前
The author is surprised at the justice's competence, but, by the time someone gets promoted to the ECJ (remember, they go all the way through their undergraduate degree, then through their postgraduate legal training, then maybe some more training, then a placement, then a junior position...etc) they are going to be pretty well read and probably pretty competent too. To top it off, they are totally unaccountable and unbeholden to anyone (ie: it's the EU).<p>In short, you can expect an an international copyright judge in a very senior court to be smart and to do what he feels like.
Roboprog超过 13 年前
So, Mono is likely to be declared "safe" in Europe next year, it seems.
评论 #3291046 未加载
WalterBright超过 13 年前
I thought this was settled when the first PC clone BIOS was written using "clean room" techniques.
petegrif超过 13 年前
This should be no surprise. The case was weak. Copyright offers no practical intellectual protection for software. And in this case the software in question was reverse engineered!
评论 #3292160 未加载
评论 #3291708 未加载