TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Will Coursekit Launch Up-End Blackboard?

34 点作者 dget超过 13 年前

10 条评论

briandear超过 13 年前
The only problem is that professors don't usually pick the software they use to deliver their online course -- they can certain pick certain applications, but the professors aren't the "buyer" it's the schools and cracking that nut is very, very difficult since Blackboard has heavy investment (and contractual agreements) with so many of the pick players in higher ed. Even if a professor wanted to switch, Blackboard integration in higher ed is far deeper than a single class. Higher ed and enterprise is exceptionally difficult to disrupt when it comes to institution-level installations. There's a reason many orgs are STILL using Windows XP and IE 6. Fighting institutional inertia is massively difficult.<p>If coursekit wants to accomplish that goal though, they should take a facebook approach -- one school at a time. Convince some small school that isn't using Blackboard to try their software. Then expand the school targets outward to adjacent schools in the geographic region. Build up a core school-base and then go after bigger targets. It'll take more than great software. Institutional penetration is far more about sales skill than code quality (see Windows XP comment above.)
评论 #3293527 未加载
评论 #3293452 未加载
cwilson超过 13 年前
I headed up the team behind a similar project a few years ago called Classhive (www.classhive.com). The UI we built for the project is eerily similar to CourseKit, and we faced a lot of the same difficulties mentioned in this thread to get it to take off (which it ultimately did not). Even taking the one school at a time approach, it's still very difficult to get teachers to completely change which system they use when they know students are using Blackboard for every other class (even if it's an awful piece of software).<p>An approach that we didn't have time or the support to explore was building something that students would champion themselves, regardless of University or teacher support. This meant jumping into an area that might be controversial, and support things like the sharing/selling of notes, cheating, gossip, and more social interaction between students in large classes.<p>Until someone creates a product in this space that is inherently addictive and breaks a few rules, I do not think anyone is going to knock Blackboard down as the king.
评论 #3293870 未加载
Homunculiheaded超过 13 年前
I worked in academia for quite a few years. This is an industry that could really use disrupting, but I'm incredibly cynical about the possibilities of this ever happening (as far as changing internal software).<p>Just about anyone on HN could write a better lms than blackboard, and sell it for 1/100 of the cost for huge profit margins (okay maybe some exaggeration here, but not much). But blackboard is not unique, almost all institutional level software in universities is terrible and expensive.<p>This isn't a problem with bad vendors it's a problem with the institution doing the purchasing.<p>For starters the idea that "Cohen plans to sell Coursekit to professors instead of letting university IT departments slow him down." Is flawed on many levels.<p>Firstly it's no accident that university IT departments are unnecessarily central to purchasing decisions, they spent and will continue to spend much political capital on campus to remain that way. As soon as campus IT departments catch wind of this strategy, they will fight in every-way to make it as amazingly inconvenient as possible to go this route. Most professors are busy enough that it's not worth their time to fight campus IT over what is ultimately a minor part of their course.<p>Second faculty don't usually have budgets to purchase product like this for their classes (again institutions have deliberately grown this way to keep central departments powerful), they may have grant money but they would never spend it on something like this. So at a minimum it would have to be a departmental purchases, which mean that someone in the department will have to handle keeping track of making sure everything is paid for, students know how to use it etc. At which point departmental admins will just say "why not just let IT deal with it"<p>Additionally almost all professors I know already have their hands full with research and just teaching, let alone worrying about the burden of infrastructure. Most professors use Blackboard, not because it's useful, but because their campus IT departments have created university policies that make it a requirement or at least 'strongly suggested'.<p>I would love to see blackboard taken down, but in the end they're only a symptom of a much larger problem in higher ed.
评论 #3293991 未加载
评论 #3294150 未加载
评论 #3293848 未加载
genieyclo超过 13 年前
No disrespect to CourseKit, but what's so special about this LMS vs all the other new ones on the market every year? BBBB suing you is not the biggest issue LMSes have, it's actually getting traction.
评论 #3293545 未加载
timdorr超过 13 年前
Isn't Blackboard known for being a very litigious company? I wonder if that's come to be an issue for Coursekit yet or not.<p>I've talked with at least two folks that wanted to start up something in this space, but had fears about lawsuits from Blackboard.
dget超过 13 年前
Oops - accidentally submitted link to the second page. For the first page, go here: <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/petercohan/2011/11/29/will-coursekit-launch-up-end-blackboard/" rel="nofollow">http://www.forbes.com/sites/petercohan/2011/11/29/will-cours...</a>
callil超过 13 年前
Can't wait to see where this goes. The world needs a game changer in this space.
评论 #3293278 未加载
ericmsimons超过 13 年前
I just went through the ordeal of creating, launching and failing at building a successful LMS. The good news is that I learned what teachers/professors really need, and it took falling on my face to learn it. If Coursekit fails, I hope they figure out a better route as well.
joshu超过 13 年前
Articles with question marks in the title are inevitably answered "no".
drivebyacct2超过 13 年前
Jesus I hope so. Blackboard is probably the worst piece of software I have to use with any regularity.