TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Can Wikipedia no longer be edited in Texas?

29 点作者 HotGarbage超过 2 年前

4 条评论

advisedwang超过 2 年前
The bill only allows enforcement by the Texas Attorney General, who can decide who to go after. Creating an over-broad law and then giving someone the power to selectively apply it is putting a huge amount of power in their hands.<p>Do you think the AG is going to go after companies censoring their political enemies? Of course not - this is about ensuring their allies are protected only. Moreover because the law is so nuts, companies can&#x27;t &quot;just&quot; comply with the law, they actively need to court the state AG&#x27;s favour so they don&#x27;t get sued.<p>This is&#x27;t about making Wikipedia illegal - it&#x27;s about making everything online illegal so they can control internet discourse.
评论 #32957312 未加载
PopAlongKid超过 2 年前
&gt; it has more than 97 million monthly active users on the site.<p>&gt; And the interactive nature of the site is not incidental to the service. It’s the whole point.<p>I don&#x27;t understand this part. I consult Wikipedia many times per week, but I am not an &quot;active user&quot;, I don&#x27;t have an account, and I don&#x27;t use it &quot;interactively&quot; at all -- just read-only.
评论 #32956595 未加载
评论 #32984511 未加载
ilaksh超过 2 年前
Hopefully this is not a controversial statement. But I think it&#x27;s interesting how this law and it&#x27;s existence is being contextualized in wildly different ways depending on political leanings.
ars超过 2 年前
Wikipedia isn&#x27;t censoring anything at all. The users are, but this law doesn&#x27;t prevent them.<p>I&#x27;m flagging this because this article is pure stupidity. Which ironically is a claim the author of this piece is leveling at others, not realizing it applies to him more than anyone else.
评论 #32957679 未加载
评论 #32958166 未加载