TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Pennsylvania school district bans Girls Who Code Book

39 点作者 Bhilai超过 2 年前

9 条评论

forgottofloss超过 2 年前
The index, which is linked in the article, reveals that the banned books are not How to Code books but a series of chapter novels that feature girls who are interested in coding but know nothing about it. Furthermore, they are only banned as classroom curriculum books, not banned from the library, which makes sense because the first book appears to contain no classroom merit whatsoever -- just like most chapter books aimed at kids.<p>I skimmed through the first book. It&#x27;s cute. A bunch of girls who are excited to learn to make apps join the coding club and get tricked by their female teacher into solving a bunch of coding trivia outside the classroom in order to develop friendships. They finally learn some actual coding from the protagonist&#x27;s older brother. There really is no merit to this as a classroom assigned reading book, and it would probably be a drag for boys to read. The writing style and thoughts and feelings of the main character are obviously directed heavily at girls, except for the older brother who&#x27;s a cool prankster and who actually knows how to make basic utilities.<p>The Girls Who Code textbook by the same author, Learn to Code and Change the World, is not banned.
评论 #32986132 未加载
评论 #32985747 未加载
lisper超过 2 年前
&gt; “It felt very much like a direct attack on the movement we’ve been building to get girls coding.&quot;<p>That&#x27;s because it <i>explicitly is</i> such an attack:<p>“What we are attempting to do is balance legitimate academic freedom with what could be literature&#x2F;materials that are <i>too activist in nature</i>, and may lean more toward indoctrination rather than age-appropriate academic content.” [Emphasis added]<p>The problem here, of course, is that activism is very much in the eye of the beholder, and so banning books on the grounds of being &quot;too activist&quot; effectively give you license to ban anything you want.
评论 #33003466 未加载
ghiculescu超过 2 年前
Looks like it is not the case: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;centralyorksd&#x2F;status&#x2F;1574388246569795590" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;centralyorksd&#x2F;status&#x2F;1574388246569795590</a><p>It’s a shame the article doesn’t mention that.
bwanab超过 2 年前
Ah, the irony of modern English usage: &quot;Moms for Liberty&quot; pushing for book bans.
评论 #32985607 未加载
评论 #32987226 未加载
kiwih超过 2 年前
This is absurd. As an educator, there is no excuse for banning books like this. To get the best thinkers in tech, we need to welcome everyone into tech, and these kinds of book provide on-roads for non-traditional pathways (i.e. representation matters).
评论 #32985684 未加载
jimmygrapes超过 2 年前
Horrible activist outrage click bait writing.<p>From <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cysd.k12.pa.us&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cysd.k12.pa.us&#x2F;</a>:<p>&gt; The District was recently made aware of a national article published last evening falsely claiming that Central York School District has banned the book&#x2F;series Girls Who Code. The information published in this article is categorically false. This book series has not been banned, and they remain available in our libraries. If you have any questions, please email communications@cysd.k12.pa.us.
bjt2n3904超过 2 年前
A question: has anyone here actually read this book?<p>While I&#x27;m frustrated that books like Maus are being caught up in these book bans, I&#x27;m more frustrated that books like &quot;Gender Queer&quot; are being treated as important books that should be in school libraries and accessible to fourteen year olds.<p>But most of all, I&#x27;m angry that whenever this discussion happens, people try to gaslight me into believing this is just bigotry, or ideological boogeyman that don&#x27;t exist, or partisan politics.<p>It would be far more tolerable for someone to say, &quot;Yes, books that teach and advocate queer theory should be available for children at X age.&quot; That, I can tolerate. Being told this is all a figment of my imagination, I cannot.<p>Where this leads? Because of the rampant intellectual dishonesty and outright lies about what&#x27;s happening, it&#x27;s very difficult for me to believe that &quot;Girls Who Code&quot; is JUST a book that aims to introduce women to software development.
评论 #32985879 未加载
评论 #32985635 未加载
评论 #32985704 未加载
评论 #32985735 未加载
评论 #32985608 未加载
评论 #32985673 未加载
评论 #32985697 未加载
评论 #32985609 未加载
评论 #32985665 未加载
评论 #32985663 未加载
评论 #32985693 未加载
yakshaving_jgt超过 2 年前
I don&#x27;t think anyone can really say if the grounds for banning those books are legitimate until they&#x27;ve actually read them. In any case, I have had women complain to me that software conferences I&#x27;ve recommended they attend (because they are focused on bringing more women into programming) were <i>too activist in nature</i> and turned them off programming.
Bostonian超过 2 年前
Any school library has limited space and must decide what books to stock. I don&#x27;t know if the book in question is good or not. I will say that public schools should not be supporting clubs that discriminate on the basis of sex, as the Girls Who Code organization does. My daughter has been able to participate, but my son has not, which is unfair.
评论 #32985520 未加载
评论 #32985432 未加载
评论 #32985472 未加载
评论 #32985487 未加载
评论 #32985631 未加载
评论 #32985588 未加载
评论 #32985428 未加载