> real world… Emacs… AutoCAD… Julia… LISP is probably not a language you end up using professionally<p>uh? No more examples??<p>- <a href="http://www.lispworks.com/success-stories/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lispworks.com/success-stories/index.html</a><p>- <a href="https://lisp-lang.org/success/" rel="nofollow">https://lisp-lang.org/success/</a><p>- <a href="https://github.com/azzamsa/awesome-lisp-companies/" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/azzamsa/awesome-lisp-companies/</a><p>- Clojure?<p>- <a href="https://github.com/vindarel/list-of-languages-implemented-in-lisp" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/vindarel/list-of-languages-implemented-in...</a> - <a href="https://github.com/dundalek/awesome-lisp-languages" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/dundalek/awesome-lisp-languages</a>
As a user of (the modern) C++ I would still prefer Lisp's (lack of) syntax. The abundance of parentheses does not bother me, and I find, for example,<p><pre><code> [](){}
</code></pre>
(valid C++ syntax) to be worse in comparison.
>However, there are LISP flavored versions of C<p>For anyone interested the example given is from <a href="https://github.com/tomhrr/dale" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/tomhrr/dale</a>