Qt 6.4

Tried to use QT for a new product based on a STM32F769 MCU some time ago. I got laughed at and waved off when asking for the budget needed to buy/licence QT stuff. To be fair, they need a business model, but the target audience seems just to be automotive or anyone who's planning to roll out something with at least a million pieces in mind.

Qmetaobject-rs crate makes it very easy to write qt with rust.<p>I&#x27;ve said it before and i will say it again. A good gyi toolkit and that too cross platform is an incredible amount of work. Rust would be better off funding qt support than trying 20 different things because somehow anything less than &quot;pure&quot; rust is filthy.

I love Qt, technology-wise. But the business model... Distribution Licenses? Come on!

Is there a tutorial of how to make a desktop GUI app using only QML&#x2F;Quick&#x2F;whatever, without C++ or Python? I want to build a desktop app and will gladly offload the work logic to a separate app to be invoked in background via CLI.

Qt in the browser sounds cool.. but feels reminiscent of shockwave..

How viable is LGPL&#x27;d Qt, in its current situation, for closed-source desktop applications?

I tried some Qt WASM demos here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.qt.io&#x2F;qt-examples-for-webassembly" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.qt.io&#x2F;qt-examples-for-webassembly</a><p>Nice idea but the problem is that these literally run as a foreign app in the browser. You can&#x27;t cut and paste or highlight text. They are not web pages.<p>There is a niche for this, probably in business and industrial uses or for making legacy apps available over the web, but it&#x27;s not something I&#x27;d consider for a new system that had to in any way be &quot;web-like&quot; or that was primarily used over the web.