TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Is there a gap in the wiki/docs+issue tracking space?

2 点作者 v1l超过 2 年前
Most tools in the market are either&#x2F;or and have a disjointed experience. They&#x27;re either for documentation&#x2F;memos&#x2F;wikis or issue tracking. Yes, Confluence is part of the Atlassian landscape but it&#x27;s not that tightly coupled (from a user experience perspective) with JIRA. They don&#x27;t &quot;live alongside&quot; each other so to speak.<p>Notion is a little better but fails pretty badly at being an dev issue tracker.<p>Why does this matter? Because with most teams now remote&#x2F;async&#x2F;distributed, I&#x27;m seeing a lot more context not easily accessible and spread thin. I can see a lot of benefits from written context + tickets being more tightly coupled.<p>Does it seem to you that there&#x27;s an opportunity for software that takes a fresh look at this?

1 comment

clintonb超过 2 年前
What problem are you trying to solve?<p>It&#x27;s unclear what a tight coupling of documentation and issue tracking look like, or how it&#x27;s beneficial.
评论 #33024029 未加载