TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Apple to Samsung: Don't make rectangular tablets

19 点作者 sathishmanohar超过 13 年前

6 条评论

nextparadigms超过 13 年前
When a lot of people were commenting that Apple doesn't want anyone else to make rectangular tablets or use rounded corners before, everyone thought they were exaggerating and joking. Apparently, Apple did actually believe that.<p>Maybe their design patents would make sense if someone made a tablet that is 99.5% alike, like some Chinese rip-off. But "rectangular" tablet? That's <i>exactly</i> like saying other car manufacturers shouldn't use round wheels.
评论 #3311944 未加载
Gustomaximus超过 13 年前
This is ridiculous by Apple. If they pull this off I hope Palm come forward with the old Pilot 5000 with its rectangle shape, flat screen and rounded corners. I don't get why Apple can claim these features are all theirs and no-one else's.
c4urself超过 13 年前
Most interesting one:<p>- cluttered appearance<p>as a suggestion for what Samsung should do different from Apple. How condescending is that?
评论 #3311088 未加载
评论 #3311078 未加载
click170超过 13 年前
This reads like a list of things <i>not</i> to do if you want a sleek sexy product. Not that I'm surprised Apple would instruct their competition to design this way, I guess I was just expecting more subterfuge.
siglesias超过 13 年前
What device is this? <a href="http://cl.ly/3c0v082z1G393w0l2y39" rel="nofollow">http://cl.ly/3c0v082z1G393w0l2y39</a><p>That's a picture I took at a Sam's Club a couple of days ago. If you guys really think that this form factor is the be-all-end-all for tablet design, you're seriously, seriously deceiving yourselves. If you've spent any amount of time thinking critically about the differences between various forms of art--different buildings, different authors, different paintings, different sculptures--then you know there is such a thing as style that seems perfect locally but distinct globally. The argument is "how could it be otherwise?" But buildings haven't converged on one material, one look. Paintings are absolutely distinguishable between painters. Books are absolutely distinguishable between authors, even those with minimalist writing styles. Why? Because the works of art that make history are originals, not replicas [1].<p>Apple chose minimalism, and everybody acts like that is the only style available. It isn't. I'd love to see a circular tablet. I'd love to see a computer aesthetic that is absolutely embellished and ornamented. Might be cool and benefit me as a consumer. Let's please move away from this insistence that it can't be otherwise. It can.<p>[1] don't be pedantic
评论 #3316419 未加载
kermitthehermit超过 13 年前
This has been posted before, but it looks like everyone needs to promote their blogspam on HN and reddit.