TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ugliest Airplane Ever Built Predicted the Future

159 点作者 lxm超过 2 年前

26 条评论

csours超过 2 年前
The airplanes of the late 1920s through the late 1930s are absolutely wild. Engines were starting to become more capable, designers had more of a clue, people were willing to spend money on things... but the designers didn&#x27;t have the whole clue yet, so you get some really amazing things like open top monoplanes that flew at 10k feet.<p>This YouTube channel covers some really interesting stuff from that time frame:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=b0g8HiAbNAE" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=b0g8HiAbNAE</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=5uFNOtsucKE" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=5uFNOtsucKE</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=rwa9unx9mpQ" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=rwa9unx9mpQ</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=l9Qz6c38sGk" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=l9Qz6c38sGk</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=aVnxQCa4ieM" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=aVnxQCa4ieM</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=1DNGBIqiOaw" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=1DNGBIqiOaw</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=KD0SYy-stt4" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=KD0SYy-stt4</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Z2v5MvgAkaI" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Z2v5MvgAkaI</a><p>Oh, and the Stipa Caproni herself:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=X3K0QPfmznY" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=X3K0QPfmznY</a>
评论 #33146416 未加载
评论 #33147623 未加载
评论 #33149405 未加载
p1mrx超过 2 年前
Looks like the old Google App Engine logo: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;imgur.com&#x2F;a&#x2F;h1S7Nop" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;imgur.com&#x2F;a&#x2F;h1S7Nop</a>
Animats超过 2 年前
The ugliest locomotive. the ALCO RS-1 (1941), changed railroading.[1] This introduced the basic design of a narrow central section with railed walkways and a cab offset from one end. Worked equally well going in either direction. Good maintenance access from the walkways, where doors opened on the equipment. Could be used for both switching and road trips. No attempt to make it look cool, or impressive. Just useful.<p>General Motors Electro-Motive Division introduced the GP7 in 1949, which was a solid product of which thousands were built. Looked much like the RS-1 After that, most Diesel-electric freight locomotives followed the same pattern, and still do.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;ALCO_RS-1" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;ALCO_RS-1</a>
pier25超过 2 年前
Honestly I think it&#x27;s actually kinda cute. Would totally work in a Ghibli film.
评论 #33148961 未加载
评论 #33148369 未加载
评论 #33147075 未加载
hodgesrm超过 2 年前
I came here expecting to see something about the A380. Completely wrong but not disappointed! The Stipa Caproni is definitely in a class of its own!<p>p.s., A380s are nice inside but the outside hardly makes the heart sing. They remind me of the Spruce Goose. [0]<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Hughes_H-4_Hercules" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Hughes_H-4_Hercules</a>
评论 #33145641 未加载
评论 #33150741 未加载
anigbrowl超过 2 年前
Given that it&#x27;s apparently extremely stable in flight and the takeoff&#x2F;landing are the main issues (largely because pilots literally couldn&#x27;t see what they were doing), I wonder if this design will make a comeback for unmanned drones? it seems ideal for low power applications where agility isn&#x27;t the top consideration.
评论 #33149666 未加载
MichaelCollins超过 2 年前
The Stipa-Caproni was certainly odd, but I wouldn&#x27;t call it ugly. Imho, the ugliest plane ever made was the M-15 Belphegor, which has the unusual distinction of being a <i>jet powered</i> crop dusting biplane.
评论 #33145247 未加载
评论 #33145005 未加载
评论 #33145155 未加载
dingaling超过 2 年前
Same principle later implemented by Willard Custer but using wing channelling rather than the fuselage<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.historynet.com&#x2F;custers-channel-wing&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.historynet.com&#x2F;custers-channel-wing&#x2F;</a>
11thEarlOfMar超过 2 年前
&quot;...in the days when inventors were experimenting with many different ways to improve aircraft utility and performance.&quot;<p>Lovingly lampooned in 1965&#x27;s <i>Those Magnificent Men In Their Flying Machines</i>:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=TO7-_fGqGTg" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=TO7-_fGqGTg</a>
vehgtuftg超过 2 年前
This isn&#x27;t convincing. The turbofan is a good idea because the propulsive efficiency is better than a turbojet.<p>The Stipa is a ducted fan, but the resemblance to a turbofan is superficial.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Turbofan#Principles" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Turbofan#Principles</a>
评论 #33145710 未加载
mannykannot超过 2 年前
The design appears to have an exit nozzle area at least equal to that of the inlet. If so, this is sub-optimal from a propulsive efficiency point of view. The cross-sectional area inside is clearly less (mainly due to the engine nacelle), making this a convergent-divergent nozzle, which is desirable only when the flow goes supersonic. For subsonic conditions, a convergent nozzle, with its exit narrower than its intake, is better.<p>See de Piolenc, &#x27;Ducted Fan Design vol. 1.&#x27;, 2001
评论 #33148408 未加载
评论 #33146492 未加载
krisoft超过 2 年前
Based on the title I was so sure it will be about the Northrop Tacit Blue.<p>Ugliest airplane (in my opinion): check. Predicted the future (by being a fore-runner of modern low observeability stealth planes): check.
评论 #33145454 未加载
评论 #33146758 未加载
评论 #33146083 未加载
bitwize超过 2 年前
Some guy on YouTube builds model planes propelled by power tools. This one reminds me of the plane he built with a leaf blower as its propulsion system: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=MBC6AZY_O80" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=MBC6AZY_O80</a>
m463超过 2 年前
There&#x27;s a park in silicon valley, baylands park, where people flew R&#x2F;C aircraft all the time.<p>I remember one guy would fly this ridiculous plane, which seemed to be a rectangular board with an engine on top.<p>It was the aerodynamic equivalent of a flounder (which has aesthetics by comparison), or maybe a cafeteria tray without the lip.<p>lol
Stamp01超过 2 年前
I know Earthworm Jim&#x27;s pocket rocket when I see it!
评论 #33146524 未加载
roydivision超过 2 年前
Not ugly at all, cute! I&#x27;d love to build a replica model, initial searches haven&#x27;t thrown up anything. If anyone has any links I&#x27;d appreciate it.
bullen超过 2 年前
Tunnan = Barrel<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Saab_29_Tunnan" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Saab_29_Tunnan</a>
评论 #33149681 未加载
GekkePrutser超过 2 年前
I absolutely love the Caproni C22J in Microsoft flight simulator. He wasn&#x27;t just building weird planes, this one is amazing.
kulor超过 2 年前
Reminds me of the sleek F6 which looks like someone simply added a cockpit and wings to a jet engine: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.rafmuseum.org.uk&#x2F;research&#x2F;collections&#x2F;british-aircraft-corporation-lightning-f6&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.rafmuseum.org.uk&#x2F;research&#x2F;collections&#x2F;british-ai...</a>.
评论 #33146408 未加载
vehgtuft超过 2 年前
This isn&#x27;t convincing. The turbofan is a good idea because the propulsive efficiency is better than a turbojet.<p>The Stipa is a ducted fan, but the resemblance to a turbofan is superficial.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Turbofan#Principles" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Turbofan#Principles</a>
lefrancais超过 2 年前
Reminds me of this french prototype developped during the 50&#x27;s <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;SNECMA_Col%C3%A9opt%C3%A8re" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;SNECMA_Col%C3%A9opt%C3%A8re</a>
tus666超过 2 年前
&gt; was the direct predecessor of the turbofan engine<p>Looks like it <i>was</i> a turbofan engine, maybe the first.
WalterBright超过 2 年前
&gt; the Stipa-Caproni was the direct predecessor of the turbofan engine<p>That&#x27;s a bit of a stretch. The axial flow turbojet design&#x27;s compressor evolved in stages into the turbofan.
praveen9920超过 2 年前
Ugly&#x2F;pretty is function of general familiarity. If we are looking more familiar with this kind of planes, we probably would have called Airbus or concord ugly.
theteapot超过 2 年前
Ugly?! I quite like it. The mig15&#x27;s stouter big brother.
评论 #33145861 未加载
aliswe超过 2 年前
Looks like the villains airplan in Disneys Tailspin?