TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

$570M worth of Binance’s BNB token stolen

156 点作者 labarilem超过 2 年前

17 条评论

glofish超过 2 年前
Crypto losses always remind me of Kramer and Jerry talking about losses.<p>- Not a problem. It is a write-off for them.<p>- How is it a write-off?<p>- All these big companies do it - they just write it off!<p>- Write what off? You don&#x27;t even know what a write-off is!<p>- Maybe I don&#x27;t but they do. And they are the ones writing it off!<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=XEL65gywwHQ" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=XEL65gywwHQ</a>
评论 #33122031 未加载
评论 #33121909 未加载
knrz超过 2 年前
samczun has a thorough Tweetthread explaining how this hack worked, if you’re looking to dive deep into the nerdy rabbit hole <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;samczsun&#x2F;status&#x2F;1578167198203289600?s=46&amp;t=5mWGgmZF7JY8JdrQy2f_iQ" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;samczsun&#x2F;status&#x2F;1578167198203289600?s=46...</a>
评论 #33121528 未加载
评论 #33128766 未加载
TheKnack超过 2 年前
I got an email that is made to appear as if it&#x27;s from Binance today, having never interacted with Binance in any way. The email looks like it could potentially be an actual Binance email someone has copied and modified.<p>The actual sending domain for the email is sg.djamo.ci. Most of the links in the email are bit.ly redirects to <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bina-defi.net&#x2F;markets&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bina-defi.net&#x2F;markets&#x2F;</a>. Whois lookup for this domain only results in &quot;Whois record is unavailable at this time.&quot; The server IP appears to be hosted in Germany at a hosting provider called Xsserver Gmbh. Links to &quot;Binance.com&quot;, Unsubscribe, etc. in the email point to sg.djamo.ci and don&#x27;t work (either that or my Pi-Hole is blocking them).<p>Everything on the web site prompts the user to connect their wallet. I can&#x27;t tell if this is an elaborate phishing attempt to drain people&#x27;s wallets, or a legitimate site that&#x27;s set up in a way that look suspicious.<p>Edit: The footer of the email says the following, in spite of none of the links in the email going to the legitimate Binance.com site<p><i>Kindly note: Please be aware of phishing sites and always make sure you are visiting the official Binance.com website when entering sensitive data.</i>
评论 #33123191 未加载
评论 #33134634 未加载
NikolaNovak超过 2 年前
I have an ignorant question, which will demonstrate my ignorance of both crypto and fiat.<p>Was money &quot;Stolen&quot;, or &quot;additional tokens generated&quot;?<p>What I mean by that is: If I have a chair, and you come and take my chair, you&#x27;ve stolen my chair.<p>If I am carrying $200 in cash, and you take my $200 in cash, you&#x27;ve stolen my cash.<p>(if I write a nice piece of music, and you copy it, you&#x27;ve performed &quot;copyright infringement&quot; and we can discuss whether that is &quot;theft&quot; or not in legal vs semantic &#x2F; colloquial terms)<p>In this <i>particular</i> case, were <i>specific</i> tokens&#x2F;crypto&#x2F;something taken out of someone&#x27;s wallet, OR were additional seemingly-valid tokens generated &quot;out of thin&quot; air? Was it a transfer or generation issue? Was some entity <i>directly</i> negatively affected through a specific loss, or were many entities affected by subsequent inflation due to tokens being generated?<p>Does my question make sense to anybody but me? :)
评论 #33123228 未加载
评论 #33122860 未加载
评论 #33124311 未加载
评论 #33122838 未加载
评论 #33123663 未加载
评论 #33122667 未加载
scifibestfi超过 2 年前
I hate to say it, but it&#x27;s looking more and more like the Bitcoin maximalists will end up being proven right in the end.
评论 #33125040 未加载
评论 #33127246 未加载
mensetmanusman超过 2 年前
Imagine creating a financial system that incentivizes some of the smartest folks in the world to legally spend nights and weekends robbing those that are less intelligent.
评论 #33128734 未加载
yborg超过 2 年前
So how does one launder a half-billion dollar heist like this? Asking for a friend.
评论 #33122814 未加载
评论 #33122324 未加载
评论 #33122042 未加载
评论 #33124113 未加载
评论 #33122434 未加载
评论 #33121688 未加载
评论 #33122087 未加载
评论 #33122147 未加载
matthewaveryusa超过 2 年前
Changpeng &quot;there&#x27;s also a few more votes regarding how the hacked funds should be handled will be voted by the community&quot;<p>Oh I see how this works now
cersa8超过 2 年前
These bridges seem to be the weakest links in crypto.
评论 #33121984 未加载
评论 #33121742 未加载
darkteflon超过 2 年前
If memory serves, BNB itself was originally created and distributed to Binance customers as part of an attempt to make them whole for BTC losses from a hacking incident.
评论 #33125382 未加载
评论 #33123206 未加载
评论 #33127261 未加载
评论 #33122866 未加载
throwoutway超过 2 年前
What tech is a cross-chain bridge? Is it code running on the Ethereum chain or something else?
评论 #33120984 未加载
sneak超过 2 年前
Binance’s BSC chain implementation is not open source, however - it would be relatively straightforward for them to make a new release that arbitrarily rewrites history (like ethereum did).<p>It’s not like the people running the BSC daemon are critical about the code. It’s a blockchain run by a central dictatorial authority, if there is a “critical update release” then the nodes will upgrade.
评论 #33127274 未加载
lm28469超过 2 年前
This is good for bitcoin
FabHK超过 2 年前
Who was the victim? Were additional BNB minted? So everyone (every holder of BNB, that is) suffered some loss through inflation in proportion to their holding, theoretically?
评论 #33124050 未加载
jcpham2超过 2 年前
Is this stealing or double spending? The original concept was that double-spends were impossibru because proof of work.<p>Then someone pointed out hilariously the origins of BNB &quot;token&quot; in the first place - because ETH 2.0 PoW edition (not Ethereum Classic (ETC) that&#x27;s a whole different boondoggle) recently migrated to PoS...<p>Nevermind this is dumb
评论 #33124012 未加载
robertk超过 2 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;wallstreetbets&#x2F;comments&#x2F;xxyaow&#x2F;this_never_gets_old_south_park_banking_101&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;wallstreetbets&#x2F;comments&#x2F;xxyaow&#x2F;this...</a>
hamiltonians超过 2 年前
none of these people ever get arrested or caught. perfect crime
评论 #33127111 未加载
评论 #33122261 未加载