TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

US airport websites under DoS attack

102 点作者 SevenNation超过 2 年前

12 条评论

auslegung超过 2 年前
&gt; Importantly, the systems targeted do not handle air traffic control, internal airline communications and coordination, or transportation security.<p>&gt; &quot;It&#x27;s an inconvenience,&quot; the source said.<p>&gt; The attacks have resulted in targeted &quot;denial of public access&quot; to public-facing web domains that report airport wait times and congestion.
TecoAndJix超过 2 年前
@dang I feel like this qualifies for the &quot;Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is <i>misleading or linkbait</i>; don&#x27;t editorialize&quot; rule. The airports themselves are not under attack.
评论 #33154079 未加载
VoidWhisperer超过 2 年前
Given what the article says, this seems like a bit of fearmongering on ABC&#x27;s part.
评论 #33153493 未加载
评论 #33153497 未加载
评论 #33153544 未加载
评论 #33153876 未加载
评论 #33153445 未加载
citilife超过 2 年前
&gt; (NEW YORK) -- Some of the nation&#x27;s largest airports have been targeted for cyberattacks Monday by an attacker within the Russian Federation, a senior official briefed confirmed to ABC News.<p>Senior official from what agency &#x2F; organization are making those claims?<p>&gt; The attacks have resulted in targeted &quot;denial of public access&quot; to public-facing web domains that report airport wait times and congestion<p>Why would they be doing DDoS on this service?<p>&gt; Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport reported around 10:30 a.m. ET that its site is back up and running and that &quot;at no time were operations at the airport impacted.&quot;<p>And operations are not being impacted...<p>I hear &quot;Russia&quot; is doing X and at this point I don&#x27;t believe it without evidence being presented. Anonymous sources are equivalent to saying &quot;some random person says X&quot;. Also why would they do anything with not negative impacts.<p>This isn&#x27;t much of a story IMO
评论 #33153531 未加载
评论 #33153392 未加载
评论 #33153640 未加载
ramesh31超过 2 年前
It seems like the big bad boogeyman of Russian cyberwarfare has also turned out to be a paper tiger. They are grasping at straws.
评论 #33153496 未加载
评论 #33153314 未加载
评论 #33153294 未加载
评论 #33153422 未加载
benatkin超过 2 年前
Another article about it: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nbcnews.com&#x2F;tech&#x2F;security&#x2F;us-travel-websites-knocked-offline-russian-hacker-group-calls-attack-rcna51482" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nbcnews.com&#x2F;tech&#x2F;security&#x2F;us-travel-websites-kno...</a><p>&gt; there is no indication that any airport operations were affected
wil421超过 2 年前
Here’s a much better article from CNN. [1]<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnn.com&#x2F;2022&#x2F;10&#x2F;10&#x2F;us&#x2F;airport-websites-russia-hackers&#x2F;index.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnn.com&#x2F;2022&#x2F;10&#x2F;10&#x2F;us&#x2F;airport-websites-russia-ha...</a>
bvogelzang超过 2 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.flychicago.com" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.flychicago.com</a> still appears to be down
bush-bby超过 2 年前
So basically we can assume that a lot of airports use the same service for hosting?
评论 #33153431 未加载
评论 #33153568 未加载
lima超过 2 年前
Obligatory XKCD: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;xkcd.com&#x2F;932" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;xkcd.com&#x2F;932</a>
NovemberWhiskey超过 2 年前
Obligatory xkcd reference: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;xkcd.com&#x2F;932&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;xkcd.com&#x2F;932&#x2F;</a>
dangerface超过 2 年前
inb4 it was the Russians as retaliation for nord stream. As a brit im still glad the US blew it up.<p>edit: Should have read the article before shit posting.