TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

California legalizes digital license plates for all vehicles

28 点作者 TeacherTortoise超过 2 年前

19 条评论

kube-system超过 2 年前
This seems like a solution in search of a problem. I have never changed the plate on a vehicle. What use is this?
评论 #33190285 未加载
评论 #33190386 未加载
评论 #33190555 未加载
评论 #33190191 未加载
评论 #33203536 未加载
评论 #33193564 未加载
评论 #33190568 未加载
评论 #33190307 未加载
评论 #33190514 未加载
makerofspoons超过 2 年前
I can sort of see the value of Reviver plates for fleets, but their consumer product seems very expensive for what you get. I can already in Colorado (where they are also legal) renew my registration on my phone. The existing app for many modern cars can tell you where the vehicle is. That leaves the personalization aspect for $20/month. Plus, if you opt for the battery model you now have the added inconvenience of needing to remember to charge your license plate. I just don't get it.
评论 #33190297 未加载
评论 #33190447 未加载
Roark66超过 2 年前
How can you write a long article about new type of license plate and not show a single photo of one... I'm quite disappointed after following this link.
评论 #33190688 未加载
评论 #33190407 未加载
MisterTea超过 2 年前
I can see these getting destroyed or vandalized in all sorts of situations. Parked in a spot that enrages someone for some reason? smashed plates. Jerk kids looking to have some destructive fun? smashed plates. Idiot driver looking at phone behind you? smashed plates (and car.)<p>Also, how do we guarantee these are tamper proof and there&#x27;s no plate kill switch which enables a driver to blank a plate when running through an automated toll plaza or red light&#x2F;speed camera which relies on license plates for identification?<p>And I can imagine these being a boon for municipal revenue when faulty plates fail or are kicked in and traffic cops happily ticket owners for improperly displayed plates.<p>I see ZERO incentive for these.<p>&gt; &quot;Californians are known to be early adopters of emerging innovative technologies. We welcome new opportunities to automate and integrate as many parts of our lives as possible, enabling us to streamline mundane tasks and stay connected. Our cars are no exception,&quot; said Reviver co-founder and chief strategy officer Neville Boston.<p>Yawn.
neilv超过 2 年前
This story really needs the <i>old-school</i> The Register biting treatment.
prepend超过 2 年前
What’s the advantage to the car owner here? They cost more than stamped or printed plates. Why do I want this since my plate doesn’t really change other than putting a sticker on once a year.<p>The downsides include ads (pretty insane) and tracking (don’t care).
评论 #33194093 未加载
basicplus2超过 2 年前
Just need to hack them to display a different number when the speed camera flash goes off
评论 #33190570 未加载
评论 #33190315 未加载
评论 #33190298 未加载
VSerge超过 2 年前
Besides bringing nothing of value compared to existing licence plates, these would be more expensive and insecure. They would probably have a vastly worse carbon footprint, and consume way more energy and resources to make.
brudgers超过 2 年前
<i>Perhaps most importantly to the average car owner, Reviver said Rplate owners can renew their registration online through the Reviver mobile app.</i><p>Renewing registration online in California is already incredibly fast and easy.<p>I&#x27;d bet its probably easier than an app is going to make it.<p>Simply because there was more money to develop it, no whims of an appstore to comply with, and no bored designers looking to differentiate the design.<p>By which I mean it is total driven by function and very good at that.
hypeatei超过 2 年前
I&#x27;m honestly surprised this is going through given all the concerns with hacking and such.<p>There seems to be a lot of opportunity for hackers (script kiddies) to either:<p>1) Change their license plate number before committing a crime.<p>2) Troll (endanger) other drivers by changing their text to &quot;STOLEN&quot; as shown in the linked pages.
mirages超过 2 年前
Does this means if I hack my way into the hardware I can change the number on the fly while I drive ? ....
dijonman2超过 2 年前
Why does this even exist? More explicit tracking and more ads.. plus:<p>&gt; monthly fee of about $7.<p>Just another tax.
评论 #33190554 未加载
评论 #33190708 未加载
maratc超过 2 年前
eInk screens are notoriously easy to break, while metal plates are mostly for the life of the vehicle. Metal plates also need no charging or batteries change.<p>Why would anyone want this?
Overtonwindow超过 2 年前
Not only is it a solution in search of a problem, but if you’ll forgive me, I think I speak for many when I say that I can’t wait to hack it!!
sschueller超过 2 年前
I would make the claim these e-Ink plates are not suitable for road use as they make the readability much worse.
评论 #33190518 未加载
edmcnulty101超过 2 年前
I would like one of these that blinks out whenever I pass near a traffic camera.
dataflow超过 2 年前
Why can&#x27;t they get rid of registration stickers?
评论 #33190702 未加载
rtanks超过 2 年前
It is expensive and, in my opinion, insecure.
pessimizer超过 2 年前
Since this makes about as much sense as designer identification cards, instead of debating practical issues as reasons why this would pass I would start cynically by checking for financial connections between Reviver and California government.<p>Seeing as Reviver started in 2009 and were allowed testing from 2013 that didn&#x27;t start until 2017, I&#x27;d check the connections of pols or administrators who left in 2012 or 2014, too. That four-year gap makes me think that they got state permission before they had anything resembling a product, so it might have needed to be done before someone in particular left their influential job.<p>edit:<p>The press release can&#x27;t stop mentioning politicians, and a list of groups who would definitely endorse anything for a check pretending that this is important innovation.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;reviver.com&#x2F;press-release&#x2F;reviver-announces-passage-of-digital-license-plate-approval-legislation-in-california-ab-984-enabling-permanent-statewide-adoption&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;reviver.com&#x2F;press-release&#x2F;reviver-announces-passage-...</a><p>&gt; Neville Boston, Reviver Co-Founder and Chief Strategy Officer [said] “We’d like to thank Assemblymember Lori. D. Wilson for spearheading this important bill, as well as our previous authors and many diverse partners for their help in reaching this exciting milestone. We are especially grateful to the California Black Chamber of Commerce, California New Car Dealers Association, Silicon Valley Leadership Group, and the California Police Chiefs Association. Without their unwavering support, this wouldn’t be possible.”<p>-----<p>&gt; “I am honored and humbled to see AB 984 signed into law,” said Assemblymember Lori D. Wilson (D-Suisun City). “As a member of the California Legislative Technology and Innovation Caucus, I am thrilled to build upon the past successes of the Legislature that first implemented this program. AB 984 strikes a necessary balance between innovation and privacy while digitizing the only thing on our cars today that remain antiquated, license plates.”<p>-----<p>&gt; “In 2013, I authored SB 806, a bill that authorized an alternative device pilot program with the CA DMV and sparked the evolution of the digital license plate, ” said Senator Ben Hueso. “AB 984 enroots a successful pilot program and exemplifies California’s leadership in technological innovation, while maintaining the integrity of thoughtful security, privacy, and convenience.”<p>-----<p>&gt; “California is home to the rapidly growing technology of digital license plates,” said Majority Leader Emeritus Hertzberg. “California has always been a place for innovation and opportunity, and AB 984 shows how we can use technology to improve compliance, offer convenience, and develop industry standards.”<p>edit:<p>More on Ben Hueso - this seems like literally the first thing he did when he got into office, which was 2013. The other thing he&#x27;s famous for is: &quot;In March 2017 Hueso was the lead author of the controversial California Senate Bill 649 which would have removed a city&#x27;s ability to control where the 5G cell service antennas are placed, transferring that power to the state.&quot; <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Ben_Hueso" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Ben_Hueso</a>