TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Apple can't call an iPad an iPad in China, says court.

48 点作者 adhipg超过 13 年前

11 条评论

shimon_e超过 13 年前
Wow $1.6 billion. I remember a case in China few years ago when a peasant found a 3cm bug in a bottle of Sprite. He sued Coca-Cola for 4 rmb ($0.64). The court ruled in his favor but only awarded him 2.05 rmb.<p>I wonder if this is a change in heart in how much the Chinese courts will be awarding in future cases.
评论 #3324435 未加载
mikhailt超过 13 年前
We don't really have the whole story here.<p>If you read the news story here from China: <a href="http://topics.scmp.com/news/china-business-watch/article/Apple-faces-fight-or-big-payout" rel="nofollow">http://topics.scmp.com/news/china-business-watch/article/App...</a><p>&#62; The Hong Kong court found that Apple and IP Application, while drawing up the agreement for that sale, discovered the two mainland iPad trademarks were not owned by Taipei-based Proview Electronics as they were led to believe, but by Proview Technology.<p>&#62; Apple said the defendants, while acknowledging the mistake, refused to rectify the matter and asked Apple to pay US$10 million for the two trademarks. Apple and IP began their action against the Proview group on May 20 last year.<p>All of this points that Apple didn't exactly do this intentionally.
pi18n超过 13 年前
Although I don't know if it's fair to tar them all with the same brush, I find it ironic that a Chinese company would cry foul on trademarks.
评论 #3324706 未加载
评论 #3323848 未加载
mrkmcknz超过 13 年前
For some bizarre reason this made me smile.
评论 #3323729 未加载
评论 #3323542 未加载
elithrar超过 13 年前
I think it's extremely unlikely Apple would sell the iPad under any other name. The 'brand' is too strong—and is probably worth $1.6b to them.
评论 #3323624 未加载
评论 #3324070 未加载
ugh超过 13 年前
<i>“Their copyright infringement is very clear.”</i><p>Wrong translation, wrong statement or different laws?<p>Other than that: Boring.
评论 #3324428 未加载
评论 #3324539 未加载
评论 #3323795 未加载
评论 #3323798 未加载
评论 #3323796 未加载
PakG1超过 13 年前
I used to own a Proview CRT monitor back in the day. My, my, how things have changed.
mdonahoe超过 13 年前
What does the word "iPad" look like in Chinese?
评论 #3325017 未加载
xedarius超过 13 年前
iPad is a strong brand, and I can't see Apple selling it as anything else. However it is not worth $1.6b. If the company holding the copyright wasn't about to go to the dogs I'd be more concerned. Apple can enter into a lengthy legal wrangle and wait for the company in question to fold.
评论 #3323800 未加载
评论 #3323841 未加载
zephjc超过 13 年前
I'm sure whoever decided this got a nice kickback.
ChrisArchitect超过 13 年前
So I can't get a real iPad from a fake Apple store in China? I guess Apple will have to open some more real stores and sell renamed 'fake' iPads under another name. haha