TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

My PhD Genealogy

129 点作者 hkc超过 2 年前

22 条评论

kragen超过 2 年前
I spent some time in 02016 digging through different sorts of academic lineages. It turns out, for example, that you can also trace Leibniz back to Copernicus: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;dercuano.github.io&#x2F;notes&#x2F;academic-lineage.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;dercuano.github.io&#x2F;notes&#x2F;academic-lineage.html</a><p>Thrun&#x27;s page seems to have an error about Leibniz: &quot;Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 1966, 1967, 1976&quot;<p>It would be nice to be able to trace figures like al-Tusi back to Plato and Imhotep, to know if there really was an unbroken line of personal mentorship the way there is in the Buddhist lineages, or if at some point the oral line was severed. Perhaps during the Roman rampages through Greece, the line of transmission of philosophy only survived in Alexandria, or less plausibly, somewhere in India, only to resurface in Arabia while Europe was sunken into its Dark Ages. Or perhaps it had to be recovered from the few manuscripts the Christians hadn&#x27;t yet recycled into hymnals, like the Archimedes Palimpsest.<p>We know that somewhere between Eudoxus and Galileo the idea of freely postulated axiom systems was lost, and it was not really fully rediscovered until the 19th century.
评论 #33268874 未加载
评论 #33268764 未加载
评论 #33268594 未加载
评论 #33268716 未加载
seydor超过 2 年前
Academia is not that big, is quite incestuous, and such trees or descent are not rare. I think there was a website that listed people&#x27;s academic family<p>here is one for neuroscience: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;neurotree.org&#x2F;neurotree&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;neurotree.org&#x2F;neurotree&#x2F;</a>
评论 #33271294 未加载
评论 #33269639 未加载
lpolovets超过 2 年前
I started browsing <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu&#x2F;</a> after reading this post. Some of the genealogies are wildly impressive. For example:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu&#x2F;id.php?id=38586" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu&#x2F;id.php?id=38586</a><p>Bernoulli -&gt; Euler -&gt; Lagrange -&gt; Poisson and Fourier
评论 #33270442 未加载
mandevil超过 2 年前
You can really see the results of the ebbs and flows of generations in this genealogy. The massive post-war three part economic, technological, and population booms just jumps out of this data. Ph.D&#x27;s granted in this genalogy, per decade. 1870&#x27;s: 1 1880&#x27;s: 2 1890&#x27;s: 0 1900&#x27;s: 3 1910&#x27;s: 0 (they were fighting a war, no time for dissertations) 1920&#x27;s: 2 1930&#x27;s: 2 1940&#x27;s: 1 (They were fighting a war, no time for dissertations) 1950&#x27;s: 0 (Baby bust from the great depression) 1960&#x27;s: 4 (The intra-war and postwar kids, with funding and jobs) 1970&#x27;s: 2 1980&#x27;s: 0 (Too soon to be have their own students for a 1995 Ph.D)
uptownfunk超过 2 年前
This makes me want to get a PhD to join the family.
parsiad超过 2 年前
This looked like fun so I wrote a tiny script to generate these graphs for mathematicians using data from <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mathgenealogy.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mathgenealogy.org&#x2F;</a>. Here is what it looks like for Gauss: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;raw.githubusercontent.com&#x2F;parsiad&#x2F;math-genealogy-graph&#x2F;main&#x2F;18231.svg" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;raw.githubusercontent.com&#x2F;parsiad&#x2F;math-genealogy-gra...</a>. If you want to make your own, I stuck the script here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;parsiad&#x2F;math-genealogy-graph" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;parsiad&#x2F;math-genealogy-graph</a>.
WiSaGaN超过 2 年前
There is a site for mathemitics where you can search with names: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mathgenealogy.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mathgenealogy.org&#x2F;</a> pretty comprehensive according to my anecdotal evidence.
josters超过 2 年前
I really like the simplicity of this.<p>I suppose this was done by hand. Having such an overview while doing the research would be really beneficial for discovering novel ideas and connections. I haven&#x27;t come across such a tool as of yet.
评论 #33267507 未加载
评论 #33267682 未加载
评论 #33267479 未加载
pctrsq0perenl超过 2 年前
This reminded of a book that I read a while ago. It listed the important ideas that lead to modern computer science in a chronological manner[1]. Is there any work done to trace the genealogy of computer science like [2]?<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mitpress.mit.edu&#x2F;9780262045308&#x2F;ideas-that-created-the-future&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mitpress.mit.edu&#x2F;9780262045308&#x2F;ideas-that-created-th...</a> [2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu&#x2F;</a>
评论 #33272136 未加载
jgalentine007超过 2 年前
If you like this, you might be interested in AstroGen, the Astronomy Genealogy Project that I helped design: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;astrogen.aas.org" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;astrogen.aas.org</a>
评论 #33269805 未加载
anm89超过 2 年前
Jean-Baptiste Fourier<p><pre><code> | </code></pre> Joseph Lagrange<p><pre><code> | </code></pre> Leonhard Euler 1726<p><pre><code> | </code></pre> Johann Bernoulli 1694<p><pre><code> | </code></pre> Gottfried Leibniz 1666<p>I was never aware of this connection. Is there some reasons or story behind how all of these geniuses clustered together?
评论 #33269388 未加载
breck超过 2 年前
Here are some simple visualizations of this data: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gist.github.com&#x2F;breck7&#x2F;b88155a58cbf83d32283b9ea50bf8c77" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gist.github.com&#x2F;breck7&#x2F;b88155a58cbf83d32283b9ea50bf8...</a>
searine超过 2 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;academictree.org&#x2F;flytree&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;academictree.org&#x2F;flytree&#x2F;</a> does something similar for genetics or the base site for dozens of other disciplines.
评论 #33269370 未加载
thedailymail超过 2 年前
Leibniz - Bernoulli - Bernoulli - Euler - LaGrange was a pretty good run!
dekhn超过 2 年前
He just needs to make a movie with Kevin Bacon and publish with Erdos to round things out. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Erd%C5%91s%E2%80%93Bacon_number" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Erd%C5%91s%E2%80%93Bacon_numbe...</a>
评论 #33269814 未加载
评论 #33268604 未加载
_1超过 2 年前
Pretty cool. I had never thought to do this we my PhD genealogy before, it took about 10 clicks to get to Poisson (the first name I recognized).
herodotus超过 2 年前
This is very cool, but I think it is a stretch to say that Rheticus was a student of Copernicus.
chatterhead超过 2 年前
Do people use these genealogies to pick which schools to go to and people to learn from?
etrautmann超过 2 年前
The field of Neuroscience tends to track lineages with Neurotree.org
laurentoget超过 2 年前
we are cousins!
nathias超过 2 年前
neat, I can trace mine to Kant
larodi超过 2 年前
Sadly a predominantly white male genealogy.
评论 #33271242 未加载