Not again!!! Cant believe that they[cnn/Time] are still using the same old buggy lame system they implemented for finding the "Influential People list" [<a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27475" rel="nofollow">http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27475</a> ] It was an easily hackable one and it still is. Weebly is #1 on the list now, and once again [honestly, i am embarrassed to say this ], i am responsible :(<p>For the "influential people list", what pg said became true ["Even if it wasn't hackable, it would still produce garbage results" ]. The final list had nothing to do with the "democratically" voted list(hacked list). <p>The developers who worked on this particular voting system should be ashamed of themselves. They should have implemented atleast a basic IP check.