TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Tomorrow the Unix timestamp will get to 1,666,666,666

248 点作者 bubblehack3r超过 2 年前

29 条评论

nixcraft超过 2 年前
Here is how to get the date from the Unix timestamp (GNU&#x2F;Linux coreutils):<p><pre><code> date -d @1666666666 </code></pre> macOS&#x2F;bsd coreutils:<p><pre><code> date -r 1666666666</code></pre>
评论 #33318871 未加载
评论 #33317752 未加载
shashurup超过 2 年前
Something like 30 years ago I came across a magazine in which there was a calendar with set of events for each day so that you can have a pretext to drink everyday. After a while the idea of a similar service came to mind - a program which would figure the nearest &quot;round&quot; number of seconds, minutes, days in hex, oct, bin etc. So it is more than 20 years already and I&#x27;m still thinking it would be great to implement it finally.
fimdomeio超过 2 年前
This should be a comemoration of the things that are easy for computers to read and look like a representation of hell for humans. We can&#x27;t in any way find meaning in what 1,666,666,666 seconds are, we can only atribute some magical evil meaning to a number.<p>We would start the party with google deep dream, move to algorithms hiring and firing people, crime prediction, some guy ranting that his life was ruined when youtube close his account and the impossibility of talking to a human, and then would end with a bang reaching 1,666,666,666.<p>I am a fun party planner.
tingletech超过 2 年前
I went to a party (I think EFF sponsored it) at golden gate park when we hit 1,000,000,000
评论 #33317338 未加载
评论 #33317915 未加载
评论 #33317893 未加载
sbf501超过 2 年前
Fun fact: Unix timestamp will eventually be every integer number from 1 to 4294967295
评论 #33321245 未加载
评论 #33319595 未加载
评论 #33320548 未加载
westurner超过 2 年前
Approximations of Pi: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Approximations_of_π" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Approximations_of_π</a><p>&gt; <i>In the 3rd century BCE, Archimedes proved the sharp inequalities 223⁄71 &lt; π &lt; 22⁄7, by means of regular 96-gons (accuracies of 2·10−4 and 4·10−4, respectively).</i><p><pre><code> 223&#x2F;71 = 3.1408450704225 666&#x2F;212 = 3.1415094339622 π = 3.14159265359 22&#x2F;7 = 3.1428571428571 </code></pre> Is π a good radix for what types of math in addition to Trigonometry? And then what about e for natural systems; the natural log.<p>&quot;Why do colliding blocks compute pi?&quot; <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;jsYwFizhncE" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;jsYwFizhncE</a> <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.3blue1brown.com&#x2F;lessons&#x2F;clacks-solution" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.3blue1brown.com&#x2F;lessons&#x2F;clacks-solution</a> <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;3Blue1Brown&#x2F;comments&#x2F;r29vm5&#x2F;rational_approximations_of_pi&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;3Blue1Brown&#x2F;comments&#x2F;r29vm5&#x2F;rationa...</a> ... Geogebra: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.geogebra.org&#x2F;m&#x2F;BhxyBJUZ" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.geogebra.org&#x2F;m&#x2F;BhxyBJUZ</a> :<p>&gt; <i>The applet shows the old method used to approximate the value of π. Archimedes used a 96-sided polygons to find that the value of π is 223&#x2F;71 &lt; π &lt; 22&#x2F;7 (3.1408 &lt; π &lt; 3.1429). In 1630, an Austrian astronomer Christoph Grienberger found a 38-digit approximation by using 10^40-sided polygons. This is the most accurate approximation achieved by this method.</i>
cygx超过 2 年前
At that time, a total of 1,666,666,693 seconds will have passed since 1970-01-01 00:00:00 GMT as Unix time pretends leap seconds don&#x27;t exist...
评论 #33319195 未加载
greenbit超过 2 年前
Why didn&#x27;t 1,618,033,998 get this much buzz?? Is there a rational explanation for this?
评论 #33324696 未加载
tragomaskhalos超过 2 年前
The number of the beast is pretty explicitly the exact number six hundred and sixty six, not &#x27;six six six&#x27;, so any other concatenation of the digits should really be meh even to the apocalyptically inclined.
评论 #33320704 未加载
protomyth超过 2 年前
Well, there is about three devils worth of pain in our Unix servers sometimes.<p>I remember being in a building that was 668 and we called it neighbor of the beast (US streets have odd on one side and even house numbers on the other).
评论 #33316756 未加载
评论 #33317483 未加载
评论 #33318376 未加载
评论 #33317133 未加载
Reason077超过 2 年前
Time flies. Seems like just yesterday the clock hit 1,000,000,000 (Sun Sep 9 01:46:40 UTC 2001)
extragood超过 2 年前
One of my favorite questions from my take home interview is:<p>&gt; I just turned 1 billion seconds old. What day was I born? &gt; Show your work. Bonus points for precise second.<p>Most people would do it the hard way - determine the number of days in 1 billion seconds, and then work backwards to get the date.<p>The approach that I look for (and surprisingly few people thought to do) was to get the current unix timestamp, remove the leading 1 (billions) and get the datetime for that timestamp.
9front超过 2 年前
Apple I was priced at $666.66. Look at what Apple became, a beast!
评论 #33318651 未加载
sieste超过 2 年前
I won&#x27;t upvote because it currently has 166 points.
bloopernova超过 2 年前
To pretty print the Unix timestamp in your ZSH prompt, you can use something like this:<p><pre><code> function prompt_epoch() { printf -v COMMA_EPOCH &quot;%&#x27;d&quot; ${EPOCHSECONDS} p10k segment -f 66 -t ${COMMA_EPOCH} } </code></pre> It relies on zmodload zsh&#x2F;datetime to get EPOCHSECONDS. In the example above I&#x27;m using it with the powerlevel10k prompt.
dylan604超过 2 年前
Guess what else will happen, Unix timestamp will get to 1,666,666,667, then 1,666,666,668, etc.<p>That actually looks like the rent on the old office facility at a company I worked for, only a few decimal places to the left: $16,666.66&#x2F;month &lt;shudder&gt;
评论 #33317235 未加载
jl6超过 2 年前
Closing in on the Y2K38 problem.
评论 #33317993 未加载
评论 #33320039 未加载
user8501超过 2 年前
I think it is often an incorrect assumption that the people who flaunt numbers like this are being tongue in cheek.<p>77
polotics超过 2 年前
If anybody&#x27;s interested, there is a best-guess on why the heck 666 was declared to be the &quot;number of the beast&quot; in ancient scriptures: It&#x27;s a statement that each one of us is our own worst enemy, as this is the number you can easily make an image of with your left hand.<p>The fact that this was inadvertently recycled into the WP gesture is abysmally hilarious.
评论 #33320009 未加载
评论 #33320002 未加载
评论 #33319126 未加载
评论 #33319229 未加载
评论 #33319929 未加载
greenbit超过 2 年前
I know it&#x27;s irrational but now I&#x27;m looking forward to 1732050808
gerikson超过 2 年前
In about 13 hours at time of writing, so <i>today</i> in most US timezones.
whalesalad超过 2 年前
at ~10:57EST i&#x27;ll be toasting this event with some kind of intoxicant
评论 #33318183 未加载
yewenjie超过 2 年前
Happy Halloween.
评论 #33318347 未加载
timwaagh超过 2 年前
And Lucifer shall walk the earth
altares超过 2 年前
Praise the sun!
groffee超过 2 年前
It&#x27;s kind of funny people are so obsessed with 666 when it&#x27;s a mistranslation, the actual number was 616.
评论 #33317662 未加载
评论 #33317648 未加载
评论 #33317529 未加载
评论 #33317477 未加载
评论 #33317428 未加载
评论 #33317419 未加载
Ruq超过 2 年前
Why did I just get &quot;Dawn of the Final Day&quot; vibes?
stvnbn超过 2 年前
why is this relevant?
评论 #33324182 未加载
w00d3nsp4c3m4n超过 2 年前
What is the exact unix time for &quot;a cold day in hell&quot;?