TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Onion files Supreme Court amicus brief defending the right to parody

119 点作者 clockworksoul超过 2 年前

7 条评论

antiterra超过 2 年前
Previous discussion in <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=33076821" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=33076821</a>
评论 #33483932 未加载
pixl97超过 2 年前
LegalEagle did a video on this that&#x27;s pretty funny and insightful.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=LxTWonQvXkw" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=LxTWonQvXkw</a>
supernova87a超过 2 年前
It&#x27;s very funny. And I respect the court for allowing it to be filed (as I understand it, amicus briefs need permission to be filed).<p>&quot;...<i>The Onion intends to continue its socially valuable role bringing the disinfectant of sunlight into the halls of power... And it would vastly prefer that sunlight not to be measured out to its writers in 15- minute increments in an exercise yard</i>...&quot;<p>&quot;...<i>The petition for certiorari should be granted, the rights of the people vindicated, and various historical wrongs remedied. The Onion would welcome any one of the three, particularly the first</i>...&quot;<p>Just to clarify though, the case isn&#x27;t exactly about the right to parody, it&#x27;s whether an officer of the government should receive qualified immunity if he&#x2F;she tries to arrest someone who is clearly parodying the government&#x27;s speech or website. And although the case itself is laughably &quot;small town offended police chief overexercising his power&quot;, it&#x27;s a clear test case.
Null-Set超过 2 年前
The brief itself is a good read. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.supremecourt.gov&#x2F;DocketPDF&#x2F;22&#x2F;22-293&#x2F;242292&#x2F;20221003125252896_35295545_1-22.10.03%20-%20Novak-Parma%20-%20Onion%20Amicus%20Brief.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.supremecourt.gov&#x2F;DocketPDF&#x2F;22&#x2F;22-293&#x2F;242292&#x2F;2022...</a>
评论 #33483433 未加载
评论 #33484153 未加载
goodluckchuck超过 2 年前
It’s totally backwards to suggest that all information should be assumed to be true, and that false statements this need disclaimers, and parodies need to be so obvious as to cease to be a parody. The public should confront all claims - no matter the source - with ample skepticism and indeed an assumption that the information is likely false unless proved otherwise.<p>Liability for slander, libel, etc. should only arise if the speaker has gone out of their way to state that their views &#x2F; claims are true and should be relied upon, or if there’s another special reason why consumers should believe the speaker (eg it’s their doctor, lawyer, etc).
评论 #33483673 未加载
评论 #33484504 未加载
评论 #33484178 未加载
RickJWagner超过 2 年前
Babylon Bee better be joining this.
yucky超过 2 年前
I always find it most amusing how many fans of the Onion get irrationally angry at the Babylon Bee.
评论 #33483948 未加载
评论 #33484236 未加载