TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Some companies find only humans can do the job

120 点作者 lxm超过 2 年前

12 条评论

sgt101超过 2 年前
I spent a lot of time and effort deploying automation in customer service. The idea was to do it in ways that were really valuable, as opposed to spreadsheet positive. Our management had been toasted too many times by folks selling snake oil, but my god savings were needed.<p>They just had to be real...<p>So first issue: developing measures that measure real overall service productivity... this is hard, the gaming is intense.<p>Second issue: automation generates work. Yup. When your service workers get time they use it to address difficult cases and to do the work that removes regulatory and safety risks. The rest of the time this stuff is ignored, building hidden risk for the enterprise. Relieve the pressure, and it reemerges.<p>Third issue: peak demands. Ideally automation would help you deal with peak demands enabling human staffing at sensible levels to handle most of the traffic most of the time. Sadly it doesn&#x27;t. Peak demand often seemed to be for the work that could least be automated.<p>Forth issue: the tech is a castle of lies. Ok, that&#x27;s not quite true... but there is a lot of lying. In the academic work the lying is of the form of what is left out of the experiments and evaluations - for example that the algorithm cost $100k to run or something. In the commercial world there is flat out lying - HAL I look at you, you bastard. How many RFI&#x27;s were derailed by some regional President at a supplier ringing my CIO or CEO and explaining that I was &quot;a problem&quot; and had &quot;an attitude&quot;... well, all of them. The issue is that there is no sanction. HAL is still pushing Holmes and winning contracts, and not delivering what they promise, because it&#x27;s all a lie. All that happens is that they move to the next sucker and wait for management churn at the old sucker to erase the corporate memory, and this does not take long. In reality they should all be drummed out of the business and no one should ever speak to them again.<p>But, five years later I am still flogging my guts out and they are all on their boats and golf courses. One of the bastards had his own vineyard.<p>So, <i>sigh</i>
评论 #33504821 未加载
评论 #33503068 未加载
评论 #33504748 未加载
paulpauper超过 2 年前
Automation is capital intensive to set up, so it may take years for it to pay for itself. This delays adoption considerably for smaller businesses. Hair cutting is one of those jobs that resists automation. Same for burger flipping. It&#x27;s not as if salons and restaurants can afford expensive robots to automate those tasks. Customer support automation may mean lost business due to angry customers.
评论 #33503034 未加载
评论 #33506731 未加载
评论 #33507451 未加载
oxfordmale超过 2 年前
Still the best solution is to combine robotics with humans. Humans are still infinitely flexible and much easier to dispose off than an expensive robot &#x2F;sarcasm.
评论 #33502674 未加载
评论 #33505670 未加载
monkeydust超过 2 年前
I recently tried out some of the technology in this youtube video which looks VR controlled telerobotics.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=qoyIVGB8OOk" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=qoyIVGB8OOk</a><p>There is definatley something here in terms of using human intelligence to control physical actions, perhaps as a prelude to full automation for a given task.<p>It also opens up interesting questions as to the future of the labour markets around the world where somebody in one country can control the unit of production in another, I mean we are comfortable with software outsourcing so perhaps this is not such a reach.
jvanderbot超过 2 年前
In my experience, the best bits of automation are those set up by the people doing the tasks, once given autonomy (heh) to do it themselves.<p>Then, of course, they get promoted, the tech becomes a &quot;product&quot; and they try to push it on other departments, but the original grassroots efforts by software engineers doing things other than software engineering (e.g., operating spacecraft) is solid gold.
fuzzfactor超过 2 年前
&gt;I have not seen good examples of companies successfully deploying robotic systems in low-margin, public-facing settings. — Matt Beane, University of California, Santa Barbara<p>Me neither, which has kept me at the opposite end of the spectrum for decades.<p>To this day, good apps linger where it&#x27;s still cheaper to use a human operator.<p>Going to build me a robot anyway, as soon as it&#x27;s complete it&#x27;ll be doing an invoiceable job.<p>That&#x27;s a key.<p>So it starts making money right away, admittedly not as much as having a human performing its tasks.<p>Human&#x27;s going to have to fill in when the robot is down anyway, plus serve the robot instead at intervals when it is running, just to keep it fully supplied and maintained.<p>So it&#x27;s going to require a higher-skilled human than before.<p>That won&#x27;t be cheap but I can then sell the higher skilled output for a better premium to clients most interested in the robot.
TrinaryWorksToo超过 2 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;brpDv" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;brpDv</a>
marcosdumay超过 2 年前
Ok for the cases where they found the robots weren&#x27;t flexible enough. But the &quot;people are cheaper anyway&quot; that they add on nearly every anecdote isn&#x27;t reassuring at all.
mathattack超过 2 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;brpDv" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;brpDv</a>
pcurve超过 2 年前
...yet.<p>I&#x27;m sure things will look very different 20-30 years from now.
评论 #33502095 未加载
评论 #33502770 未加载
robg超过 2 年前
Humans have a minimum wage that makes employing them anti-competitive to the robotic workforce.
评论 #33504350 未加载
评论 #33505163 未加载
评论 #33501772 未加载
评论 #33502232 未加载
评论 #33501827 未加载
EGreg超过 2 年前
Where are the best sexbots?<p>Do they even come close to what humans can do?
评论 #33505180 未加载
评论 #33506933 未加载
评论 #33502780 未加载
评论 #33502117 未加载
评论 #33502032 未加载