TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Principles of Pricing

261 点作者 talhof8超过 2 年前

8 条评论

petewailes超过 2 年前
I&#x27;d say it&#x27;s worth noting that this <i>only</i> applies to SAAS. There&#x27;s a giant pile of things missing from this if you have inventory, manufacturing or anything else more complex than software and developers.<p>Pricing is an unbelievably complex subject which this doesn&#x27;t get close to discussing properly.
Aulig超过 2 年前
If you&#x27;re looking for another in-depth (139 pages), data-driven pricing guide, I can recommend ProfitWells Price Intelligently guide: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.priceintelligently.com&#x2F;hubfs&#x2F;Price-Intelligently-SaaS-Pricing-Strategy.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.priceintelligently.com&#x2F;hubfs&#x2F;Price-Intelligently...</a>
评论 #33518007 未加载
sacrosanct超过 2 年前
&gt; <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.principlesofpricing.com&#x2F;the-price" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.principlesofpricing.com&#x2F;the-price</a><p>The USD 5.00 per month thing is relatively &#x27;cheap&#x27; but the designers of the pricing model don&#x27;t take into account all the <i>other</i> services people are signed up to. This is why super cheap tiers are great, like $1.00&#x2F;mo tiers where I may not get all features, but at least I get to save some money. Spotify, Netflix, Hosting, Domain Renewals, etc all start to add up.
评论 #33525512 未加载
m0llusk超过 2 年前
&gt; ... business ... purpose is ... to survive, and ... to maximise profit ...<p>That is kind of like saying the purpose of human life is breathing. Yes, breathing is critical and fully integrated into existence, but there is so much more to living well. Similarly the purpose of business is to create value. Survival through flows of money comes as a result of that. Money dominated conversations can help, but often miss fundamental issues. For example, there is a big psychological difference between a software service with regular payments versus occasional software releases that can be bought and owned. With the right pricing the two are essentially the same, but customers tend to have very different feelings toward each model.
评论 #33518371 未加载
评论 #33519353 未加载
评论 #33518988 未加载
评论 #33518299 未加载
评论 #33518618 未加载
评论 #33519420 未加载
derAndyG超过 2 年前
Does anybody have a similar article about service or productized service oriented pricing for agencies?
评论 #33529766 未加载
kensai超过 2 年前
Interesting wrap-up. Most of these things are probably known eve to certain laymen, but good to have them altogether.
jmacd超过 2 年前
Bessemer has created a similar roundup&#x2F;guide: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bvp.com&#x2F;pricing-course" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bvp.com&#x2F;pricing-course</a><p>For devs who need to implement some type of system to support all these pricing models, we recently started working on <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;priceops.org" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;priceops.org</a>
sedeki超过 2 年前
Are there other good business resources like this for tech entrepreneurs?
评论 #33529765 未加载