TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Should we abandon the multiverse theory?

14 点作者 Ideabile超过 2 年前

3 条评论

sph超过 2 年前
Holy shit the comments are terrible. Not because it&#x27;s YouTube, but since when physics has become a celebrity contest, with fans fighting over their favorite theory and physicist while talking shit about other people?<p>I see it on YouTube like I see it on here any time any Sabine Hossenfelder article is posted.<p>Did a massive delegation of K-pop stans get into astrophysics? Is everything a &quot;my idol will demolish yours any time&quot; these days, even in hard sciences?<p>Sorry for the off topic. I know nothing about physics and I don&#x27;t have a favourite physicist.
评论 #33515840 未加载
评论 #33514625 未加载
karmakaze超过 2 年前
I&#x27;ll watch&#x2F;listen to &quot;Sabine Hossenfelder, Roger Penrose, Michio Kaku&quot;.
readonthegoapp超过 2 年前
Michio: If someone in the audience can come up with a unified theory of everything, it just has to meet these three criteria...yadda yadda... and if you do come up with that, please tell me first.<p>:-D<p>i feel bad for Sabine because it seems like the moderator keeps pronouncing her name &#x27;Sabina&#x27;. maybe that&#x27;s correct?<p>and i feel bad for Michio b&#x2F;c Sabine (and Roger) was crushing him and all String Theory. the weird part about what she said is, she&#x27;s like String Theory is ridiculous, but so is the idea that mathematics has to make sense, and theories have to be testable, but i would say -- how can we have testable theories when math doesn&#x27;t have to make sense? i&#x27;ve thought of Sabine as a troll - maybe because she does that kind of in your face, &#x27;everyone is stupid but me&#x27;-way of speaking. reminds me of the EA crowd.<p>in String Theory&#x27;s defense, Michio mentioned how Fermilab got some result that does not obey the Standard Model:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.fnal.gov&#x2F;2021&#x2F;04&#x2F;first-results-from-fermilabs-muon-g-2-experiment-strengthen-evidence-of-new-physics&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.fnal.gov&#x2F;2021&#x2F;04&#x2F;first-results-from-fermilabs-m...</a><p>man, people be hating on string theory.<p>i think of George Saunders quoting Einstein:<p><pre><code> “No worthy problem is ever solved in the plane of its original conception.” </code></pre> i figure, at a minimum, some wacky theory might open up some lines of thought that might not present themselves otherwise.<p>and i think of the smartest scientists in the world at any given time, shitting all over all the &#x27;stupid&#x27; people who believe, say, that the world is round, or that the earth revolves around the sun, etc.<p>chomsky talks about how humans are limited -- thus, able to be creative -- but only up to a certain point:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=tc1hsQWzUKc" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=tc1hsQWzUKc</a><p>that&#x27;s the kind of explanation that makes me think, well, string theory (for one example) might be exactly correct, but we can&#x27;t even properly conceive of it, much less test it, etc.<p>and Sabine and Roger are like, &quot;ok fine, BUT JUST DON&#x27;T CALL IT SCIENCE.&quot;<p>ok.