TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Find Verified Journalists on Mastodon

34 点作者 2pEXgD0fZ5cF超过 2 年前

13 条评论

jp57超过 2 年前
I think the thing that makes sense here, assuming Mastodon actually becomes a popular thing, is for companies and other institutions to run their own servers and limit accounts to their employees or members. E.g. nytimes or wapo or national review or whatever could run their own servers for their journalists. NBA and NFL for their players. SAG-AFTRA for actors and TV personalities, etc.<p>I know that there&#x27;s a kind of verification mechanism already in Mastodon where you put a backlink in your website and then you get a badge. But it is an order of magnitude more complicated than &quot;this server vouches for the identity of this account,&quot; and website ownership isn&#x27;t really identity anyway.
评论 #33655261 未加载
评论 #33655326 未加载
thejosh超过 2 年前
Wow the comments here are very bitter. What do people have against people wanting to be verified for who they really are? For press this is important, so you know you&#x27;re talking to the right person.<p>Was always surprised there was no independent website&#x2F;source for this (Hey, my name is X, my details are at example.com&#x2F;1234 if you want to find how to contact me).
评论 #33659250 未加载
评论 #33655470 未加载
评论 #33655491 未加载
评论 #33655523 未加载
rdtwo超过 2 年前
I never understood “verified” tags for press. It allowed then to impersonate real experts. They should have just had a press tag
评论 #33654881 未加载
评论 #33655124 未加载
Ligma123超过 2 年前
God, what would I do without my status quo parrots?<p>Has any of these &quot;journalists&quot; have ever done any journalism, like investigating political officials, exposing corruption scandals, even if at a local level, you don&#x27;t need a global story.
adolph超过 2 年前
Seems like this is run by one well-meaning person on off hours. I wonder if this sort of multi-domain &quot;verification&quot; be automated similar to ACME protocol. Let&#x27;s say you are a bonafide reporter at the Daily Globe (or any social media entity with any org). The reporter goes to presscheck, makes an assertion, receives a token, places the token in a known location on Daily Globe&#x27;s website, presscheck watches for token and once it is present issues &quot;verification&quot; to reporter. Maybe Daily Globe has to keep the token in place for the verification to stick or maybe there is a re-verification at a certain interval.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Automatic_Certificate_Management_Environment" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Automatic_Certificate_Manageme...</a><p><pre><code> Who is eligible? Any journalist globally, including freelancers, newsletter writers... any category, really. This site is about confirming someone is who they say they are, not defining what a &quot;journalist&quot; is. How are profiles verified? Applications are to be made here. The quickest way to get verified is by tweeting a link to your Mastodon profile on an already-verified Twitter account. Failing that, providing a company email address for us to follow up with is another great method. Freelancers and newsletter writers should include as much background information and linked worked as possible in their application.</code></pre>
kc0bfv超过 2 年前
Keyoxide and similar are a great way to establish and verify identity across a variety of platforms, and are open to more than just journalists.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;keyoxide.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;keyoxide.org&#x2F;</a>
ageitgey超过 2 年前
I made a similar thing for finding people to follow but covering all different kinds of interests and topics: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;getstarted.social&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;getstarted.social&#x2F;</a>
评论 #33654613 未加载
bertman超过 2 年前
I clicked randomly on one of the &quot;latest additions&quot; (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.presscheck.org&#x2F;journalists&#x2F;lauren-wolfe" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.presscheck.org&#x2F;journalists&#x2F;lauren-wolfe</a>) and ...<p>Well, the linked mastodon profile (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mastodon.world&#x2F;LaurenWolfe" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mastodon.world&#x2F;LaurenWolfe</a>) doesn&#x27;t even exist.
评论 #33655251 未加载
throwaway0x7E6超过 2 年前
that would make a great blacklist
评论 #33655312 未加载
ThrowawayTestr超过 2 年前
Why would I care or want to?
MichaelCollins超过 2 年前
This seems pathetic, like a bunch of twitter addicted journalists who&#x27;ve walked away from twitter but can&#x27;t give up their addiction to being special on twitter.<p>The twitter check was never a mark of credibility. Most of Fox News had twitter checks.
评论 #33655230 未加载
评论 #33655067 未加载
评论 #33655494 未加载
评论 #33654900 未加载
bobsmith432超过 2 年前
Who cares? Is an SVG on their profile the only thing that makes them happy in life?
psychphysic超过 2 年前
Even if you find them it&#x27;ll be a chore to follow them and see interact if not on your server.
评论 #33654549 未加载