TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Elon Is Twitter's Chaos Monkey

12 点作者 legopiece超过 2 年前

4 条评论

jareds超过 2 年前
> Elon somehow is able to cut through all that BS and ship a new feature in just a week to all his users. How? What does he know that the rest of the industry don't? I think he understands something that might sound obvious on the surface: Twitter is just a fucking website. Literally no one will die if they fuck up. Is that true? What if DM's or other private information gets leaked do to a code change? This could provide enough information to target individuals for murder depending on what the new info is.
mikkergp超过 2 年前
Elon Musk had to sell $4 billion dollars in Tesla stock in order to keep Twitter afloat. I’m not disagreeing with the core premise of the article really, nor am I really challenging Musk’s genius! but Musk can say fuck you to everybody because he has fuck you money! If he is a genius it is is in understanding the whole context, not in the individual risks he takes.<p>&gt; Elon somehow is able to cut through all that BS and ship a new feature in just a week to all his users. How? What does he know that the rest of the industry don&#x27;t? I think he understands something that might sound obvious on the surface: Twitter is just a fucking website. Literally no one will die if they fuck up.<p>Sure if your company can survive without revenue or reputation, go for it! It’s just a fucking website.<p>Yes we need more bold leaders driving change, but if almost any other CEO had done this the company would be dead already.
评论 #33691088 未加载
yamazaki超过 2 年前
Agreed that Elon is making Twitter iterate and ship much faster, but not sure the price he is paying in loss of &quot;tribal knowledge&quot; will be worth it at the other end.
评论 #33684983 未加载
fenier超过 2 年前
The author does gloss over the fact that Twitter has FTC Consent &amp; GDPR requirements to meet, which means it does have to slow down during feature development at the risk of fines.