TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Asymmetry detected in the distribution of galaxies

233 点作者 thedday超过 2 年前

25 条评论

est31超过 2 年前
They have encountered an interesting algorithmic problem here, very cool.<p><pre><code> To determine whether the universe as a whole has a preferred handedness, they had to repeat the analysis for all tetrahedra constructed from their database of 1 million galaxies. There are nearly 1 trillion trillion such tetrahedra — an intractable list to handle one at a time. But a factoring trick developed in earlier work on a different problem allowed the researchers to look at the parity of tetrahedra more holistically: Rather than assembling one tetrahedron at a time and determining its parity, they could take each galaxy in turn and group all other galaxies according to their distances from that galaxy, creating layers like the layers of an onion. </code></pre> The linked earlier work: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;academic.oup.com&#x2F;mnras&#x2F;article&#x2F;454&#x2F;4&#x2F;4142&#x2F;993302" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;academic.oup.com&#x2F;mnras&#x2F;article&#x2F;454&#x2F;4&#x2F;4142&#x2F;993302</a>
评论 #33876111 未加载
评论 #33877498 未加载
enriquto超过 2 年前
I don&#x27;t understand why do they need this complicated algorithm. If there is such a blatant bias then it can be detected by sampling a few million random tetrahedra; and that can be done instantaneously.<p>Also, why don&#x27;t they publish the list of positions of all these galaxies? (Or I couldn&#x27;t find it easily on either of the original articles [0,1]). If there&#x27;s just a million of them, this is around the same size as a single high-resolution color image. Then people can download the positions and find the asymmetries themselves!<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;abs&#x2F;2206.04227" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;abs&#x2F;2206.04227</a><p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;abs&#x2F;2206.03625" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;abs&#x2F;2206.03625</a><p>EDIT: actually, the data is public and easily available! Here is a notebook for playing with it: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;nbodykit.readthedocs.io&#x2F;en&#x2F;latest&#x2F;cookbook&#x2F;boss-dr12-data.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;nbodykit.readthedocs.io&#x2F;en&#x2F;latest&#x2F;cookbook&#x2F;boss-dr12...</a>
paulrouget超过 2 年前
Could that arise from any early parity symmetry breaking of the weak force?<p>If anyone is interested in parity symmetry or CPT symmetry in general, I can&#x27;t recommend this book enough: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Ambidextrous_Universe" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Ambidextrous_Universe</a> and in particular the part about the Ozma Problem: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Ambidextrous_Universe#The_Ozma_Problem" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Ambidextrous_Universe#The_...</a><p>Fascinating stuff.
评论 #33876423 未加载
9wzYQbTYsAIc超过 2 年前
I believe that this is the research being described in the article: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;abs&#x2F;2206.03625" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;abs&#x2F;2206.03625</a>
评论 #33875964 未加载
jhoechtl超过 2 年前
I hear topics of analysis of distribution of galaxies from time to time and always wonder how we can actually measure this distribution in any sensible way? What I mean is: Information reaches us at max the speed of light. Information about galaxies from millions of light years afar contribute to the distribution model. Thus the model incorporates spatial distributions of objects (=galaxies) which are certainly no longer true as of now.<p>Put differently: When we assume the big bang and assume further as a thought experiment that mass expands equally, the model would requires to account for information from early objects, where mass distribution was different. Otherwise the conclusion would be drawn that mass is unevenly distributed.
评论 #33876950 未加载
Lucent超过 2 年前
Oddly no mention of two-point correlation, another anomaly suggesting quantum effects at the birth of the universe gave it its large-scale structure.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Correlation_function_(astronomy)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Correlation_function_(astronom...</a>
评论 #33877442 未加载
评论 #33876540 未加载
评论 #33876550 未加载
WaitWaitWha超过 2 年前
Can someone give me a lycée dropout level explanation what they are writing here?<p>I am gathering that galaxies are spaced in tetrahedral formation, and some fashion there are &quot;mirrors&quot; i.e, tetrahedral formation but with opposite side-lengths, but now discovered that is not so?<p>I am confuserated.
quadcore超过 2 年前
<i>from a catalog of 1 million galaxies</i><p>For a lay person, reading that number is mind blowing. Quick question: how many do we think there are? Or rather, do we have some sort of a number for the total energy there is in the universe compared to that of our sun?
评论 #33875738 未加载
评论 #33875733 未加载
评论 #33875928 未加载
评论 #33875741 未加载
hossbeast超过 2 年前
Isn&#x27;t 1M galaxies just a drop in the bucket?
评论 #33875901 未加载
评论 #33875542 未加载
评论 #33875828 未加载
ggm超过 2 年前
The question might be, if you ran the experiment again, would you get the same bias, or a different one? (as in, go back to the gnab gib and .. do over)
评论 #33876908 未加载
评论 #33876143 未加载
pmayrgundter超过 2 年前
Large-scale anisometry can also be viewed as more evidence towards invalidating of the big bang model.<p>Acknowledging the usual pragmas of &quot;all models are wrong&quot; and science needs something to proceed by, I also find it useful the idea of keeping a tally of how many free parameters need to be added to our cosmology as a measure of its (increasingly poor) fit.
lamontcg超过 2 年前
&gt; “If this result is real, someone’s going to get a Nobel Prize,”<p>I hope it is real, the result sounds legitimately very exciting. Hopefully they manage to measure the same parity violation in the CMBR.
评论 #33876846 未加载
评论 #33877034 未加载
borbulon超过 2 年前
I wonder how long it took the computer(s?) to run the permutations
评论 #33875762 未加载
scotty79超过 2 年前
I think it could be interesting to measure this assymetry in different parts of the sky and make a sort of map of it.<p>Maybe the cosmos has sides?
account-5超过 2 年前
Can someone EIL5 as to the significance of this?<p>How does drawing lines between galaxies show asymmetry. Why is that important?
评论 #33878231 未加载
评论 #33877899 未加载
icare_1er超过 2 年前
I have always wondered how an initial singularity could generate something that is not symmetrical ?
lostmsu超过 2 年前
How certain are they, that the source data is not biased due to our own galaxy rotation?
pleb_nz超过 2 年前
So what did this mean in layman
评论 #33877621 未加载
tintor超过 2 年前
Does anyone know what coordinate system would be used for something like this?
评论 #33875752 未加载
评论 #33875511 未加载
评论 #33875478 未加载
评论 #33875748 未加载
zaphirplane超过 2 年前
Galactic scale warfare or galactic scale energy harvesting ? :)
867-5309超过 2 年前
<i>chaos was the law of nature; order was the dream of man</i>
评论 #33877750 未加载
phlipski超过 2 年前
Sounds to me like there&#x27;s a disturbance in the force...
thunkle超过 2 年前
How do they know the galaxies are connected?
评论 #33875092 未加载
评论 #33875229 未加载
fdvbvvgh超过 2 年前
Http:&#x2F;&#x2F;fac.com&#x2F;arc
EMM_386超过 2 年前
Given the Gosmic Microwave Background Radiation, and things like this study, there were clearly some &quot;parameters&quot; in effect at the strart of the universe.<p>I&#x27;ll stop there, call that whatever you want.<p>But whatever those parameters were, allowed me to type this comment on Hacker News.